null
US
Sign In
Sign Up for Free
Sign Up
We have detected that Javascript is not enabled in your browser. The dynamic nature of our site means that Javascript must be enabled to function properly. Please read our
terms and conditions
for more information.
Next up
Copy and Edit
You need to log in to complete this action!
Register for Free
3187347
Co-extensive Liability
Description
adsfasd
No tags specified
gsdfg
dsfg
fsdfg
law
law of contracts
guarantee
b.a. ll.b. student (2nd year)
Mind Map by
Rohit Beerapalli
, updated more than 1 year ago
More
Less
Created by
Rohit Beerapalli
over 9 years ago
66
0
0
Resource summary
Co-extensive Liability
Surety is liable for the whole amount for which the principal debtor is liable, and no more.
Surety is liable for not only the amount of the loan, but any interest or charges which may be due on it.
Maharaja of Benares v. Har Narain Singh
Trial court erred in stating that the surety was liable only for principal amount.
Hargopal Agarwal v. SBI
Where part of the principal has been recovered, liability of the surety goes down as well.
Part of the loan was recovered by disposing of some goods owned by the company.
Condition Precedent
Partial recognition under Section 144
If there is a condition that the creditor shall not act on a guarantee until a co-surety joins, the guarantee is not valid till that person joins.
National Provincial Bank of England v. Brackenbury
The defendant signed a guarantee that was intended to be a joint and several liability of three other persons with him.
One of them did not sign the guarantee, therefore there was no guarantee.
Alternately, it would be valid if the bank and sureties had an agreement to dispense with the signature.
No need to exhaust remedies against debtor before proceeding against surety.
Bank of Bihar Ltd. v. Damodar Prasad
The creditor trying to make the debtor pay would defeat the object of the guarantee.
It is the responsibility of the surety to make sure that the principal pays, not the creditor.
Union of India v. Manku Narayan
Overruled in SBI v. Indexport Registered
The decree can be executed, jointly, or severably, against the debtor, mortgaged property, and surety.
The decree holder cannot be forced to execute the mortgage decree, and only then proceed on the execution of the personal decree.
A creditor must proceed first against the mortgaged property, and only then against the surety.
Even if there is a composite decree against the debtor, surety, and mortgaged property.
Severability was not considered.
The mortgaged property of the guarantor cannot be taken possession of without notice to him.
Amulya Lal v. Tripura Industrial Development Corporation Limited
Liability of the guarantor is only secondary. It does not arise until default by the principal-debtor.
Show full summary
Hide full summary
Want to create your own
Mind Maps
for
free
with GoConqr?
Learn more
.
Similar
Contract Law
sherhui94
How Parliament Makes Laws
harryloftus505
A-Level Law: Theft
amyclare96
AQA AS LAW, Unit 1, Section A, Parliamentary Law Making 1/3
Nerdbot98
Law Commission 1965
ria rachel
The Criminal Courts
thornamelia
A2 Law: Cases - Defence of Insanity
Jessica 'JessieB
A2 Law: Special Study - Robbery
Jessica 'JessieB
Omissions
ameliathorn0325
AS Law Jury Case Quiz
Fionnghuala Malone
Criminal Law
jesusreyes88
Browse Library