Introduction of antibodies into individuals from an outside source
Antibodies aren't produced by the individual, so they aren't replaced when broken down
Short lived immunity
Active
Stimulating the production of antibodies by the individuals own immune system
Can provide herd immunity
Successful vaccination programme
Suitable vaccine must be economically available in sufficient quantities to immunise all of the vunerable population
Few side effects to encourage individuals to get vaccinated
Producing, storing and transporting must be available
Must be a way to administer properly, so training staff
Must be possible to vaccinate the vast majority of the vulnerable population
Why does vaccination not eliminate a disease?
Fails to induce immunity in certain individuals
Disease may develop immidiately after vaccination, but before immunity levels are high enough for prevention
May be mutations
New antigens change suddenlym meaning that the antigens are no longer recognised
This is antigenic variability
Lots of varieties of a particular pathogen
Pathogens can hide from the immune system
Conceal themselves inside of living cells
Living in places out of reach
People may have objections to vaccinations
Problems with control of cholera
Intestinal, so not easy to reach
Oral treatment rarekly has time to be effective as it is rapidly flushed from the intestines
Antigenic variability
Mobile populations make it difficult to ensure individuals are vaccinated
Problems with control of TB
Increase in HIV meaning more impaired immune systems
Refugees move and are housed in overcrowded places
Mobile populations make it difficult to vaccinate everyone
Aging population with less effective immune systems
MMR Vaccine
1988, combined vaccine for mumps, measles and rubella
10 years later a well respected medical journal published a study suggesting there was a higher incidence of autism amongst children who recieved the MMR
Many parents decided to have individual vaccinations, or not have their children vaccinated at all
Incidence of mumps, measles and rubella rose
Since the report was published, it has been found
Author had a confict of interests
Was being paid by the Legal Aid Board to discover whether parents
who claimed their children had been damaged by MMR had a case
Further studies have found no link
Sample size was small
The journal that published the initial research has publicly declared that, had it known all the facts, it would not have published the work
Theories must be initially treated with caution
Must be peer reviewed
Scientists may have vested interests
Personal beliefs, views and opinions may influence the way they approach or represent their research
Facts presented may have been biased or distorted to suit the presenters interests
New knowledge may challenge scientific beliefs
Ethics of vaccination
Often involves use of animals
Side effects which may cause long-term harm
Who should vaccines be tested on and how should such trials be carried out
Is it acceptable to trial a new vaccine with unknown risks only in a country where the targeted disease is common on the basis that there is the most to gain?
Most if not all of the population should be vaccinated - is it fair for vaccination to be compulsary?
Should expensive vaccinations continue even when the disease has almost been eradicated if it means less money for the treatment of other diseases
How can individual health risks from vaccination be balenced against the advantages of controlling a disease for the benefit of the population at large?