Ray Billington and science: 3 supreme, scientific catalysts for the rise in
atheism. 1. Galileo and Copernicus' development of the telescope and
space exploration. 2. Biological revelation of evolution, theory put
forward by Darwin - conflicts with creation story. 3. Pyschological
developments by Freud.
Darwin and Response to science: Darwin
claims that although it challenges religious
teachings, science cannot disprove God's
existence. Not enough evidence to confirm
nor reject
Empiricism: That that we can only experience within our 5 sense; God is non-empirical
so cannot be confined by human understanding. Hyman said 'God is exactly that that is
non-empirical'/'theism is completely incompatible with empiricism' and Hume confirms
that we can only draw conclusions from natural phenomenon so it is ridiculous to claim
God's existence. A J Ayer's verification principle - a statement that cannot be proved or
disproved is meaningless i.e God's existence.
Response to empiricism: Verification principle cannot be
proven so whole argument is redundant. Billington
contradicts himself by claiming not all beliefs can be
proved via senses i.e intuition.
The problem of evil: If God is Omnibenevolant/present/scient, how can he allow evil
and suffering (inconsisitent triad)? Evil exists, so the concept of God as we know him
cannot exist/ D Z Phillips - 'It is never justifiable to hurt someone in order to help them'
Response to evil: ST Augustine claims that sin is a product of the misuse of human
free will. Hume says that evil is necessary in the world to give man the option to
stray from God's plan (the right path) and learn from mistakes.
The rebellion of moral absolutes: meta-narratives and absolute
laws that are unchanging ethical truths. Atheism rebels against
these as religious values, and claims that what is right or wrong
is determined by individual situation and in correlation to
cultural relatives, how an individual is cultured. H P Owen - 'It is
impossible to think of a command with thinking of a
commander', reinforced by Immanual Kant's claim that moral
laws are not divine commands.
Response to moral absolutes: If relativism is opposed to
meta-narratives, would it not be more relative to take the
approach of situation ethics, and decide based on
religious values rather than absolutes.
Other faiths: Each religion claims to have the 'one true God'. John Hick
claims that faith is often determined by geographical location, and
what religions say contradicts each other - if one were to be wrong,
could all religions be incorrect? Hume - 'Whatever is different is contrary'
Religious pluralism: All religions recognise the a supreme, transcendant
reality, and different teachings are simply interpretations and equally valid.
'A many routes to the mountain of God'
Types of belief
Negative atheism: The lack of belief
in God's existence
Positive atheism: The belief that there is no god.
Agnosticism: The belief that it
is not possible to determine
God's existence without
evidence
Postmodernism: The culturally relative era
following the modern period, which revolved
around meta-narratives and knowing where you
stand, whereas the the postmodern era focuses
on relativism and personal approaches to life and
religion, rejecting moral absolutes.
Cultural constructs: The idea that our values are based on our society and culture
i.e someone who doesnt know the history of the Qua'ran might put it on the floor or
handle it wrong. Religious symbols i.e christian cross becoming commercialised as
religious values are lost to culture
No right or wrong religion: James Beckford's pick and mix
approach determines that people can take their
own personal approach to each religion and
decide what parts of what religion they chose to
follow. In order to reject absolutes we must also
reject religion claims to absolute knowledge of
God. Postmodernism allows us to not be
marginalised by the rues and closedness of 'one
true God or religion'
Religion as a spiritual journey: No religion can be proven
correct or false, so it is up to the individual to create their
own mini-narrative. Heelas uses example of new age
spiritualism which incorporates multiple religions. There
is also the argument of antirealism (Cupitt) who says God
does not exist as an extissential beimg, but a product of
our minds to represent the human spiritual search
This conflicts with the rejection of
moral absolutes; set rules for set
spiritual quest.
Living religion rather than intellectual faith:
Religion is a way of life rather than a set of rules
or teachings. Andrew right talks about 'deeds
before creeds', referring to living a christian way,
i.e a loving way rather than learning the bible or
the teachings. Caputo talks about religion as a
way of life rather than a means of gaining
spiritual knowledge. Spirituality is in the action
not the teaching.
Postmodernism: affirm or deny religion?
Affirmations
God is outside
bounds of human
knowledge -
transcendency.
Rejects absolute
knowledge ad
focuses on faith.
Living religion
is emphasised
- 'live as Jesus
did' - situation
ethics.
God as not a physical
being, such as 'holy
spirit', 'light of God'
Rejects also atheism as it
is a meta-narrative and
moral absolutes i.e God
does not exist are rejected
by postmodernism. This
presents opportunity to
explore religious and
spiritual interpretations
Denials
The rejection of absolute
truths conflicts key
teaching and absolute
affirmation of God
Living religion is a
meta-narrative, which is
rejected by postmodernism
Freedom of thought and
interpretaion (pick and mix)
challenges religious values;
'God is the way, truth and
light'
God's existence
cannot be verified-
verification principle
rejects it. Religious
pluralism does
conflict with the
absolute that there is
one true God.
This is closer to atheism than agnosticism, as it rejects God's objective
existence.