Biological: Nature: explains human behaviour
in terms of genes, brain structures, hormones,
and neurotransmitters
Psychodynamic + Cognitive:
Interactionist: take into account
both nautre and nurture and
see both as important
Psychodynamic: behaviour is the
product of the interactions between
innate and environmental factors.
Cognitive: examines internal
mental processes which are seen
as universal (nature) and how the
environment affects our htinking
and behaviour (nurture)
Strengths + weaknesses: The behaviourist apprach ignores the role of
genes, which research suggests play a large part in our behaviour.
Likewise, the biological approach does not appreciate the importance of
the environment. An interactionist approach is best, as it takes into account
all factors. However, it could be argued that while the psychodynamic and
cognitive approaches are interactionist, they still ignore some explanations.
For instance, neither takes into account the role of genes
Nurture
Behaviourism: all behaviour is the
product of the environment.
Humanistic: many of the problems and
barriers that people experience in life
are due to their environments.
Reductionism/Holism
Reductionist
Biological: it explains complex
behaviour by looking at the role of
genes, hormones, etc which are small,
easy to understand components
Behaviourism: all human behaviour is
seen in terms of a series of
stimulus-response associations
Cognitive: Information processing models
e.g. multi-store model take a reductionist
view of the mind
Holistic
Humanism: it rejects the notion that the person can
be reduced to S-R units or biological foundations
Psychodynamic: Freud takes the view that the individual
can only be understood by looking at the complexities of
their experience. Behaviour cannot be reduced down to
simple causes.
Strengths + weaknesses: A reductionist approach is scientific as
it produces explanations that are easy to test. Reductionism
underlines all psychological research, as scientists aim to break
down complex phenomena into smaller parts which can be
examined. However, reductionist explanation can over simplify
complex behaviour, and be limited in tis ability to explain. Unlike
animal behaviour, it is difficult to reduce human behaviour to our
constituent parts.
Nomothetic/Idiographic
Idiographic
Psychodynamic: Freud takes an idiographic
viewpoint, unlike someone like Eysenck who
suggests personality can be boiled down to a few
universal types
Humanistic: - it suggests that each individual's
unique experience is what counts. It is pointless
trying to study large groups of people and drawing
generalised conclusions.
Strengths + weaknesses: a nomothetic approach is scientific as it allows laws
to be generalised that apply to all people. Nomothetic methods also produce
testable hypotheses and allow us to legitimately draw comparisons between
different groups of people. However, nomothetic methods ignore individual
differences and the uniqueness of people. The idiogrpahic method, on the other
hand, emphasises the uniqueness of individuals, and can lead to a greater
understanding of behaviour. Idiographic methods are limited in their usefulness,
as results from one person can often not be generalised
Nomothetic
Cognitive: as many Participants
should be studied as possible and
general theories produced
Behaviourism: a wide number of
subjects should ideally be
studied
Biolgical: a wide number of subjects
should be studied and general
theories produced
Free will/Determinism
Free will
Cognitive: The cognitive
model of abnormality sees
the patient as being
'in-control' of their own
destiny but other aspects of
the cognitive model take a
deterministic view
Humanistic: the notion is that we all have the power of
personal agency and can grown and change if we want
to; it rejects the deterministic viewpoint of the biological
and psychoanalytical approaches
Determinism
Behaviourism:
behaviour is
determined by the
environment
Biological: Behaviour is
determined by our genes and
biology
Psychodynamic:
one of Freud’s
assumptions was
psychological
determinism, which
suggests that
nothing we ever do
is accidental
Strengths + weaknesses: a problem of free will is causality, as it
would suggest that nothing causes an action. However, free will
suggests that people are responsible for their own actions, unlike
determinism. Behaviour is not precisely predictable so there will
always be uncertainty. It is also impossible to conceive how
determinism could actually be disproved - so it is an untestable idea.
However, it is impossible to demonstrate that a behaviour is freely
chosen. Deterministic approaches also tend to be very scientific
Psychology as a
science
Scientific
approaches
Biolgical: use
of empirical
methods,
quantitative
date and
controlled
variables.
Behaviourism: only looks at
observable behaviour, not
thought processes or
emotions, so methods are
empirical
Cognitive: empirical methods are used such
as memory tests, so findings are easily
replicated and theories can be falsifiable.
However, it is hard to separate cognitive
processes
Non-scientific
approaches
Psychodynamic: based on absrtact
concepts that cannot be tested such as the
unconscious mind, and are therefore
unfalsifiable. Also uses non-experimental
methods such as cases, therefore unreliable
and cannot be generalised
Humanistic: rejected a rigorous scientific
approach to psychology because they saw
it as dehumanizing and unable to capture
the richness of conscious experience
Strengths + weaknesses: Science assumes that there are laws of
human behaviour that apply to each person (deterministic +
reductionist). Can be argued that objectivity is impossible as humans are
studying humans. verification may also be impossible because we can
never truly prove a hypothesis (Popperian example hypothesis "all
swans are white")