In theory, Conservative leaders have
greater authority than Labour leaders
Conservative leaders had few formal
obstacles standing in there way
Labour leaders supposed to be bound
by decisions made by annual confrences
and National Executive Committe (NEC)
For practical purposes power lies
with the patlimentary leaders who
donminate the rest of the party
In the 1980s party leaders
had grown in importants
In an age of political celebrity, their
public profiles dominate those of senior
colleagues and even of their parties
With the trends towards "presidentialism", leaders
are expected to determine their parties' ideologicla
direction and to deliver electoral success
However, they are by
no means all-powerful
The fact that leaders act as a kind of
"brand image" for their parties is a source
of vulnerabelity as wellas strengh
There is a tenency for "failed" leaders to be
removed or engouraged to stand down
The Conservatives have had no
fewer than 4 leaders Since 1997
William Hague (1997-2001)
Iain Duncan Smith
(2001-2003)
Michael Howard
(2003-2005)
David Cameron(2005)
Parliamentary parties
The popualr image of parliamentary parties
is that, being subject to a system of party
discipline, they are mere "lobby fodder"
Troops ready to be pushed
through the division lobbies on
the instructions of their leader
Trendes dating back to the 1970s suggest
that MPs have generally become less
deferntial and more independently minded
This refects the decline of party unity,
which can lead to splits and divisions,
which weaken the authority of the leader
Margarets Thatchers removal in 1990
demonstrates the ultimate power that
parliamentary parties have over their leaders
Major's postion was seriously
undermined by a series of backbench
revolts, mainly over Europe
Members and
constituency parties
The influence of constituency parties and
party members is difficult to evuate
Falling membership and an association
decline in the ranks of party activists suggest
that constituency parties are becoming less
The growing tendency for the major parties to develop
policy through policy committees, forums and task forces
has generally strenghened the control that parliamenatry
leaders exercise over policy development, while creating
an impression of consultation and wider debate
In the Labour party such strategies
have effectivly robbbed the party
conference of its tradtional role
On the other hand, constituency
Parties and ordinary members have
retained their power in other respects
Conservative constituency associations
have maintained a high degree of autonomy
in the selection of parliamentary candidates
The demonstration of internal party democracy
is in the role that individual party members now
play in the election of party leaders
Party backers
Some argue that the real power within political
parties lies not with people who have formal postions
of influence, but with the people who fund the party,
those who provide campaign and political finance
Labour has been affected controlled
by the trade unions thatprovide the
bulk of the partys funds
The Conservatives are similarly open to the
allegations that their major business backers exert
influence over the process of policy development
Recurrent charges of "cash or questions" and "cash
for honours", have maintained the view that rich
individuals can buy influence within parties
The Electoral Commission, which amongst other things,
place limits on campaign spending and require the public
disclosure of donationn over £5,000
Some argue, that only state funding can
only properly address these issues