the value of some types of non market
production is excluded as its too difficult to
calculate
eg) black market, volunteer work, gardening.
Limit 2: Imputed
production involves error
value that needs to be used is often estimated
because its not actually sold in normal ways.
eg) cost of providing government services that
are subsidised or provided free of charge.
Limit 3:Quality
changes may
be ignored
quality changes are not reflected in
the changes of chain volume GDP
in some cases increase quality and the
price paid or production costs come down.
eg) air tickets.
Limit 4:Calculating
and using the chain
price index involves
possible error
needs to be
statistically
altered to
remove
exaggerations or
underestimations
process of converting the
GDP at current prices to
GDP at constant prices
requires the construction of
an accurate chain price
index.
Difficult to
accurately reflect
changes in the
price of all goods
and services
entering GDP.
Limit 5: the distribution costs and
benefits of economic growth are
not considered
eco growth
leads to
increased
production and
consumption of
goods and
services
Not everyone benefits
from this due to income
inequality.
The negative externalities
of economic growth is not
shared evenly either
Some groups suffer
more than others
Chain volume
GDP fails to
shed light on
these
problems.
Limit 6: GDP on its own tells us
very little about our living
standards
misconception that
the bigger a
countries chain
volume GDP and
the faster the rate
of eco growth, the
better off people
are
Chain volume GDP
fails to measure how
well of people are.
meaningless unless we
take into account the
population size.
Once taken into
consideration we end up
with an average GDP per
capita that is GDP per
head or per person.
Overview
Remember GDP is only estimation of the
annual value of a nations output.
limitations to what GDP actually tells us
about the economy and our level of
wellbeing.
GDP should give an average estimate of our material
living standards provided that there is a fairly even
distribution of goods and services produced.
Rising GDPs are
often associated
with better
education,
increased life
expectancy, more
employment
opportunities etc.
This helps improve
both aspects of
living standards
don't assume
that better
economic
growth means
better living
standards.
Labour hours have increased meaning people are working
longer and producing more. GDP takes this as a plus but
forgets to take into account the reduced family time.
GDP also fails to
distinguish good
economic activity from
bad economic activity or
negative externalities.
In the end GDP gives us no indication of
living standards.
Alternative ways of measuring
Australia’s living standards
main reason for goal raise
societies living standards and
satisfy their unlimited needs and
wants.
chain volume GDP is the easiest and most
commonly used measure it gives us no
indication of a countries living standards.
other methods to use that try and take living
standards into consideration.
Genuine
Progress
Indicator (GPI)
Measuring
Australia’s
Progress (MAP)
Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI)
GPI - uses GDP data
but makes both
negative and positive
changes to reflect the
good and bad effects
on societies welfare
of different types of
activity and spending,
thus taking some
negative externalities
into account.
Some deductions from GDP to arrive at
GPI reflect the costs that lower our
wellbeing. Things such as family
breakdown, reduced leisure time due to
increased hours of work, road accidents
and crime rates.
Some additions to GDP to arrive
at GPI are contributions to
production derived from
performing house work and
parenting work, unpaid
community or voluntary work and
public infrastructure such as
highways.
Value of GPI reflects society’s
overall wellbeing both material and
non material. Some people argue
that this is a much better measure
because of this factor.
Sustainable = highest current level of
production possible that does not undermine
the wellbeing of future generations of
people. Therefore if the GPI increases it
means that the present generation are
improving and that future generations will not
suffer.
GPI decreases so too
does the welfare and
sustainability of economic
activity.
GPI has its weaknesses like the positive
and negative adjustments are rate
subjective in nature. The accuracy of the
data that is used to make the positive and
negative changes is also questioned.
Measuring Australia's Progress (MAP)
MAP - involves using a range of measures of progress
to build up a picture of changes in material and non
material wellbeing.
Three main categories used in this publication; society,
economy and environment. It is important to note that not
everyone thinks that all measures are important to progress.
weaknesses are
living Standards cannot
be condensed into a
single statistic or figure.
The data shows what
factors have progressed
and what have
regressed. Don't get to
see what happened
overall. Problem with
combining measures into
a single number is that
some indicators are
more important and
reliable than others so
the system of weighting
would also need to be
worked out and will
cause subjectivity.
The selection of specific
measures is subjective -
specific indicators make up
the progress measures which
are subjective and up to a
point, based on personal
values.
Inadequate statistical data - limited
range of indicators available to the
ABS upon which to determine
progress. They do not measure all
aspects and in addition some data
has not been collected for a long
time so we cant make comparisons.