null
US
Sign In
Sign Up for Free
Sign Up
We have detected that Javascript is not enabled in your browser. The dynamic nature of our site means that Javascript must be enabled to function properly. Please read our
terms and conditions
for more information.
Next up
Copy and Edit
You need to log in to complete this action!
Register for Free
77160
Family Patterns
Description
Sociology - family Mind Map on Family Patterns, created by mayjessica507 on 08/05/2013.
No tags specified
sociology - family
sociology - family
Mind Map by
mayjessica507
, updated more than 1 year ago
More
Less
Created by
mayjessica507
over 11 years ago
73
1
0
Resource summary
Family Patterns
Divorce
Trends
Since the 1960's divorce has increases peaking in 1993 at 18,000
Fallen to 10.5 per thousand married couple -2009
7/10 petitions for divorce come from women
Those who are more likely to divorce
those who marry young
those who have a child before marriage
those who cohabit
Reasons for trends
Decline in stigma
Socially acceptable
Secularisation
less people are religious
Rising expectations of marriage
Changes in position of women
Changes in the law
Legal aid
Equalised grounds for divorce
Alternatives
Desertion
One partner leaves
Stay married
Legal separation
financial and legal affairs of a couple are separated
remain married
Empty Shell marriage
A couple live together but don't love each other
Perspectives
New Right
Divorce is bad
Cause single mothers to depend on benefits
Feminists
divorce is good
Shows women escaping patriarchy
Functionalists
Divorce doesnt threaten marriage
Interactionalists
impossible to genrealise
people have different experiences
Parents and children
Reconstituted
Make up 10% of dependent familes with children
Children usually come from the woman's previous relationship
Ferri + Smith
more likely to live in poverty
more children are supported
Stepfather may be paying to support their ex's children as well as the children in his new family
Allan + Crowe
say reconstituted families face problems like
divided loyalty
no clear norms and values
contact with non-resident paretns
Childbearing
Trends
More births outside of marriage
4/10
less stigma attached to pre-marital sex
potential of cohabitation
more cohabitation
most children born to cohabiting couples
Reasons
Women having children later
or not having any
or having less children
focusing on careers first
Lone parent families
Biggest group
women who haven't married
More pre-marital sex
New Right argue
increased due to
availability of benefits which are too generous
Criticised as
many lone parents live in poverty
Partnerships
Marriage
Trends
Less people are marrying overall
Decline in 1st marriages
426,000 in 1940
146,200 in 2006
More remarriages
57,000 in 1961
98,580 in 2005
People are marrying later
Less church weddings
Reasons
Less pressure to marry
fear of divorce
change in women's positions
less stigma
secularisation
increase in divorce
creates serial monogomy
more people cohabiting
focusing on careers
Secularisation
Cohabitation
More people cohabiting
2 million couples
Less stigma
secularisation
more acceptable among young
change in position of women
Chester argues it's a trial run before marriage
Bejin argues it is just an alternative to marriage
Same sex relationships
Roughly 5-7% of the population
Laws give gays more rights
Weston argues gay couples want normal relationship norms
Cheal argues that some people prefer to be different
One person households
Increased due to divorce and separation
Marrying later
50% occupied by pensioners
Creative Singlehood
LAT
Ethnic Differences
Black families
higher proportion of lone parent families
Slavery- couples sold separately
high unemployment
causes
desertion
marital breakdown
Asian families
most are nuclear
higher proportion of extended families than any other ethnic groups
more asian's in childbearing age
15-44 than any other ethnicity
Extended family today
Types
Vertically extended
3 or more generations
horizontally extended
Nuclear family + extended family
Classical extended
Live with/near extended family
Modified
live apart but stay in touch
Parsons
classical extended family was dominant in pre-industrial scoiety
disappeared in modern society
replaced by nuclear family
Studies
Charles'
Swansea
found the classical extended
was extinct apart from in Bangladeshi communitites
Bell
both MC+WC fams
stayed in touch with kin and relied on them for support
MC
Support was mainly financial
father to son
WC
Support was more domestic
mother to daughter
Wilmott
CEF is extinct
replaced by MEF
Carribean fams.
dispersed
still supportive
More expectations on women to help fam members
most peoplse still feel obligations to their extended fam.
90% of the families studied had given/received financial help from relatives
Show full summary
Hide full summary
Want to create your own
Mind Maps
for
free
with GoConqr?
Learn more
.
Similar
Family
Bryony Whitehead
Sociology- Family and Households Flashcards
Heloise Tudor
Ma Famille
caitlindavies8
A-level Sociology: Culture, Family & Wealth
Andrea Leyden
Family & Households
caryscallan
GERMAN V&OCAB - FAMILY, OPINIONS & TIME PHRASES
plummerzoe123
German Family Vocab
LewisK
Family: Discussion Questions
Cristina Cabal
Family Key Concepts
n.paul
Postmoderism and Family Diversity
Kirsty White
Social policy for education and family
Sam Yarnall
Browse Library