null
US
Sign In
Sign Up for Free
Sign Up
We have detected that Javascript is not enabled in your browser. The dynamic nature of our site means that Javascript must be enabled to function properly. Please read our
terms and conditions
for more information.
Next up
Copy and Edit
You need to log in to complete this action!
Register for Free
805182
Misrepresentation
Description
Mind Map on Misrepresentation, created by Aaminah Habib on 29/04/2014.
Mind Map by
Aaminah Habib
, updated more than 1 year ago
More
Less
Created by
Aaminah Habib
over 10 years ago
151
1
0
Resource summary
Misrepresentation
Annotations:
MISREPRESENTATION
HAS TO BE FIVE THINGS
FALSE - dimmick v hallet - cannot be a sales puff needs to be false
FACT- bisit v wilkinson - fact cant be a statement of opinion
FACT- Esso Petro - statement of opinion allowed as they have special knowledge about petrol
ADDRESSED- sydney v rh brown - addess to the mislead party including the message to be passed on
INTENDED- peek v gurny- intented to be acted upon
1. if it puts one party into a better situation - it may be a warranty - Osscar v W
if not it is a mere misrepresentation
2. misrepresentation has to be 5 things
false
dimmit v hallot- cannot be a mere sales puff, has to be a false statement
fact
bissit v p - the fact cannot be a mere statement of opinion
esso v p it was seen that statement of opinion was a fact as they had special knowledge
addressed
sydney - addressed to mislead the innocent party and for the message to be passed on
intend
peek v gury- was intented to be acted upon
induce
eddinton- induce the mislead party into joining the contact
once all the five characteritics of a misrepresentation have been found
need to establish which type of misrepresentation it is
fradulant
Doyle v Peek
where FM established
must be made 1. knowlingly 2. recklessly 3. without belief in its truth - burden of proof lies with claimant
remedies
innocent party able to recine and claim damages by tort of deciet
negligent
at common law
hedly v bryne - obiter has a duty to care
by statue
Howard case- made without reasonable grounds of belief
remedies
only claim forseeable losses s 2 (1)
innocent
where there can be reasonable grounds for belief in the truth of the statement
remdies
misrep act 2 (2) can only get recission
recession - equitable remedy
limitations lie on liability
affirmation - continue - expressly or actions
lapse of time - for fm (runs out at time of fraud) and others date of contract itself
rights of third parties- not available to them
Show full summary
Hide full summary
Want to create your own
Mind Maps
for
free
with GoConqr?
Learn more
.
Similar
Misrepresentation
pavlina.hunt
Misrepresentation Quiz
emhutton
REQUIREMENT THAT NO DEFENSES EXIST
Jana Slavina
Misrepresentation
El-Ruth Harmony
Contract Law - Misrepresentation
Vanja Juvet
Misrepresentation
Ahmed Mirshan
Misrepresentation
Annabel Lacey
KEE2
harrym
USA stock market collapse
Emily Tisch
Conferences of the Cold War
Alina A
Část 2.
Gábi Krsková
Browse Library