By making Malcolm the hero of the play and creating
his character according to the Jacobean perception of
the perfect monarch, Shakespeare convinces the
audience of the validity of James I as King and how he
only can hold 'true power' because he's strong and
wise enough to handle it, also stating a warning to the
audience of what happens to those that try and seize
power unjustly, with the character of Macbeth a point
even more relevant after the gunpowder plot of 1605
"My thanes and kinsmen,
henceforth be earls"/"We will
perform in measure, time and
place" (5.9)
Be devoted to God, A good king is everything the
tyrant isn't, surround yourself with trusted and wise
friends, well acquainted and loved by subjects. Divine
Right of Kings
"We'd jump the life to come" (1.7
7) His Greed outweighs heaven.
Regicide
Browning
Lab.:
MLD: 'I choose never to stoop'
P's Lover: 'She was
mine' 'it has its utmost
will...I, its love am
gain'd instead'
True Power
Shakespeare
Duncan "pronounce"
responsibility of life,
subjects. good
"So clear office"
Misuse macbeth
"to th'edge o'th'sword his
wife, his babes and all
unfortunate souls that
trace him in his line"
aside/mental/possession
"our suffering country under a hand acurs'd"
"full of scorpions is my mind"
Juxtaposition! DANGER! Leader!
Browning
"Brand, burn
up, bite into its
grace"
Introduction
Both Shakespeare & Browning were accomplished writers, who
used their texts to explore ideas & issues and influence their
audience's/reader's opinions. Power is an idea that Browning and
Shakespeare both explore, presenting their ideas on 'what is true
power?' and 'who should have power and why?'. Both writers
show that 'true power' is the responsibility of life, all other forms of
power are false or fragile. They combat the common idea, in both
patriarchal Jacobean & Victorian society that women are
subservient and dependent of men, presenting gender as a false
power. They also challenge the notion that social class brings
power, a belief held in both societies -more so in the Victorian
society, where the industrial revolution made the class boundary
more prominent- both show how hierarchy makes it unstable
power as you are always beneath someone more powerful, and
highlight how just as social power can be given it can also be
taken away, showing social power is fragile.
'True power' is so great it can bring
happiness and security as well as
untold misery and destruction, as
such it should only be handled by
people strong enough, a leader. This
is where the similarity ends,
Shakespeare and Browning both
present different ideas on 'who
should be the leader and why?'.
Shakespeare argues that only a
monarch can have true power, they
are the perfect leader as they have
been divinely appointed and made
supreme, whereas Browning argues
to be a leader and have true power,
you need not be anyone specific but
rather place the needs of others
before yourself or you are sure to be
doomed.
Conclusion
Context
Shakespeare: 15th Century/Jacobean Society/'Divine
right of Kings/Gunpowder Plot -1605- betrayal, regicide =
ultimate sin/James I unstable reign due to religious and
social instability/James I wrote the Basilikon Doron a
book which described how to be a perfect monarch
Browning: 17th Century/Victorian Readers/
Strong patriarchal society, women seen as
subservient and dependent of men questioned
as Victoria took throne/ Industrial Revolution,
social class divide becomes more prominent
and powerful, workers & owners