null
US
Info
Ratings
Comments
Mind Map
by
Daniel Freedman
, created
more than 1 year ago
Mind Map on Insurance (2), created by Daniel Freedman on 19/11/2015.
Pinned to
192
0
0
No tags specified
insurance
Created by
Daniel Freedman
over 9 years ago
Rate this resource by clicking on the stars below:
(0)
Ratings (0)
0
0
0
0
0
0 comments
There are no comments, be the first and leave one below:
To join the discussion, please
sign up for a new account
or
log in with your existing account
.
Close
4078545
mind_map
2017-08-21T09:09:23Z
Insurance (2)
Warranties
What is a warranty?
A Statement or stipulation of exact truth / performance is something
of which the validity of the contract depends
How do you know when you're
dealing with a warranty?
TEST
Whether or not the parties intended the particular
statement or undertaking to be a warranty.
Depending on the type of warranty, insurer may escape liability
(cancel contract) for breach IF āmaterial / likely to have
(significantly) affected assessment of riskā
Materiality
Test (Same test as for
misrep/non-disclosure)
Was the warranty reasonably relevant to the assessment of risk, in the
sense that it either had a significant impact on the insurance companies
DECISION TO CONCLUDE THE CONTRACT or on its decision to cCHARGE
THE PREMIUMS THAT IT DID
NOTE: Onus is on the insurer when it
comes to proving materiality
Why require materiality?
To protect the insured party from inconsequential
inaccuracies (minor mistakes) in the insurance policy
Types
Affirmative
Promissory
A contractual undertakings that a certain state of
affairs exists. In this, BOTH TRUTH AND
ACCURACY ARE REQUIRED
What kind of information is covered?
It covers past and present facts, but more
importantly, also covers KNOWLEDGE OF
THE INSURED (ie. opinions).
Example
The director of a company is taking out an insurance policy
obo the company, and warrants that in the best of his
reasonable belief, the company will not be declared
insolvent within 6 months.
Effect of affirmative warranty on insuredās
obligations & insurerās rights?
As an insurance company, you have the right to
cancel the contract given that the insured party lies
in an affirmative warranty. HOWEVER, THIS
REQUIRES MATERIALITY.
āBasis of the contractā clause
Says that the answers given by the insured ARE THE
REASON why the insurance company entered into the
contract.
Insurance Company includes this clause to
elevate everything in the proposal form to
MATERIAL, so they can cancel if there is the
slightest mistake
HOWEVER, with requirement of MATERIALITY,
insurance companies CAN'T use this clause to
escape liability
An undertaking to insure that the insured party engaged in a
particular course of conduct in the future. Ie. certain fact
will exist in the FUTURE, not now.
Effect of promissory warranty on insuredās
obligations & insurerās rights?
The insured party undertakes contractual
responsibility for ensuring compliance with a
particular course of conduct. If they donāt
comply the insurance company may cancel the
contract and escape liability.
Is materiality required?
NO
Due to this, it doesnāt matter how
minor the warranty is. If itās a
promissory warranty and thereās a
failure to comply the insurance
company can refuse to pay/cancel
contract. So even the smallest
mistake can lead to the contract
being cancelled.
What may be recovered if policy
cancelled obo breach?
Unlike other insurance contracts where, unless there
is fraud, THE INSURED can only claim a PORTION
of the premiums that have been paid to the
insurance company.
Examples of PW:
Promise that you'll only transport
stock in a particular vehicle
Only my mom and I will drive my car
Iron Safe Clauses
Purpose is to give the insurance company a
reasonably reliable guide as to how much stock
is on the premises at any given time.
(3) REQUIREMENTS
1. The insured keeps a complete set of books, accounts
and stock books
2. They keep an accurate record of all business
transactions and stock
3. These books and records are kept either in a safe that is fire
safe or they remove the books and records to other premises at
night when the business is not open.
What is the effect of a failure to comply with requirements?
Just like failing to comply with any other promissory
warranty, which is that the insurance company may cancel
the contract or repudiate the claim
What if contract = indivisible?
Means that the clauses of the contract cannot be separated from
one another. This means that the WHOLE policy can be avoided if
there is a breach, even if a promissory warranty like this only
applies to certain goods.
Agentās misrepresentation & non-disclosure
Insurance Agents
Insuredās agent (ie: broker)
Insurerās agent (canvassing agent)
Misrep / failure to disclose?
Misrep / failure to disclose by agent following correct rep /
proper disclosure by insured?
NOTE: This is in the context where the broker has authorisation
from the insured party to conclude a contract with a insurance
company on the insuredās behalf
The result of this is that that misrep or failure to
disclose is IMPUTED to the insured, ie. it is deemed to
have been made by the insured themselves.
So what is the impact of this?
The same consequences of any misrep or non-disclosure will
be the result. Ie. the insurance company can cancel the
contract or repudiate the claim.
HOWEVER, the broker owes a
DUTY OF GOOD FAITH
So, although you can't claim from the insurance
company, YOU CAN SUE THE BROKER
Whether or not a misrepresentation/failure to disclose will be
imputed to the insurance company depends on the contract between
the insurance agent and the company.
The courts reply on a doctrine of constructive notice to
determine the outcome of cases like this. This doctrine
asks two questions:
1. Was the information obtained/transmitted to
the insurance company by an employee? Ie. Was the
agent an employee?
2. Was the agent under a duty to correctly transmit
information to the insurance company?
If the answers to both of these questions are yes, then the
insurance company is deemed to know the correct information.
In this situation, they canāt cancel the contract and they canāt
repudiate the claim.
When will the knowledge of the agent NOT be
imputed to the insurer?
1. When the agent doesnāt have authority.
2. Where the agent breaches itās duty to the
insurance company.
3. If the insured party knew that the agent didnāt
intend to submit the correct information.
Precautions by insurers against liability?
Transfer of agency clause (INVALID)
Basis of the contract clause
This will say that the insurerās agent is
deemed to be the agent of the INSURED.
This clause, or any other clause that
exempts the insurance company from
liability based on the agents actions, are
INVALID IN LAW.
In a bid to make everything material, it
says that the proposal form is the
reason for the insurance company
entering into the contract.
HOWEVER You canāt override the
materiality requirement just because
this clause exists.
Agent's Authority
Express
Implied
Estoppel
Contract will say that someone has
authority to act.
Assumed authority, which arises from
someone position in the company for
example
You can enforce an estoppel on an insurance company if
they deny you a claim after they have committed a
misrep/non-disclosure
NOTE: Unauthorised acts may be ratified
Will see acts authorised retrospectively and so bind
the principal (insurance company).
REQUIREMENTS:
1. Acted as agent
2. The principal must have had knowledge of
the relevant act or must have had a clear
intention to ratify that act later.
Some clauses are AUTOMATICALLY RENDERED VOID
1. Transfer of agency clause
2. Clause that purports/attempts to waive the
statutory rights of the insured party.
3. Any provisions which seek to exempt the insurance
company from the agents mistakes.
Subrogation
EG. A car accident, where two parties are involved. A
caused the accident and B is insured. B goes to insurance
company and tells them to pay up. The insurance
company pays B, and then, based on this right of
subrogation, may proceed against A and claim the amount
that the company has paid out to B in order to
reimburse itself.
Insurerās right to exercise the insuredās
rights against person (3rd party) who has
caused insuredās loss
ONLY APPLIES TO INDEMNITY INSURANCE
REQUIREMENTS
1. The loss in question is
covered by the policy.
2. The loss must have been caused
by the THIRD PARTY.
3. The insurer must have
INDEMNIFIED THE INSURED
Ie. The insurance company has either paid out or
have reinstated the object which has been
damaged or destroyed.
Only exception to these requirements is
where the parties agree that the insurer
may proceed against the 3rd party who
caused the loss, before the insurer
indemnifies (paid out to) the insured. So
parties can contract out of 3rd requirement.
What are the insurerās rights?
Two scenarios:
Insured has recovered loss from 3rd party already
Insured has not recovered loss from 3rd party
The insurance company has a right of recourse
against the insured.
The insurance company may take charge of legal proceedings
against that person to claim the loss.
Right of recourse against insured
Why does this right exist?
Limits on insurerās rights?
What kinds of claims / liability are covered?
Why does this right of recourse against
the 3rd party exist?
Prevents insured parties from retaining compensation
from both the insurance company and the 3rd party. Itās
based on the principle that nobody should be paid twice
for the same loss.
The insurance company may not claim more than the actual
amount that they have paid to the insured even if the
insured company profits from this.
Any kind of claim, it may arise in
contract, delict, unjustified enrichment.
It enables insurance companies to contain their
costs and so premiums do not need to rise
every time an insured party is paid out.
Insurer may take charge of legal proceedings
In whose name is the action brought?
Is cession or transfer of insuredās
rights to insurer required?
Is cession or transfer of the insured
rights to the insurer required?
The insured
Yes, because insurance companies donāt
like the publicity of being involved in a
whole lot of legal proceedings
NO
Statutory protection of the Insured
NOTE: Short-term and Long-term Insurance Acts
REQUIREMENTS
1. Freedom of choice
2. Actuarially sound
3. Copy of contract
4. Plain language
CPA
Confirms plain language requirement
Means that an ordinary consumer of the type targeted
by the particular insurance policy with average literacy
skills and minimal experience as a consumer could be
expected to understand the content and significance of
the document without undue effort.
Provisions limiting liability of supplier/insurance company?
These may be acceptable but certain requirements must be met:
1. They must be in plain language.
2. They must be brought to the attention of the consumer.
3. The consumer must have time to reflect on and consider them.
NOTE: Even though you can limit the
liability of the insurtance company,
unjust, unfair and unreasonable
contract terms ARE NOT PERMISSABLE.
Cooling-off periods
This is a right of the insured party to
cancel an insurance contract without
penalty or without reason.
1. Only applies when the contract is
entered into by means of direct marketing
2. The cooling off period last for 5 days
after concluding the contract.
Section 63 of Long Term Insurance Act
Protection for long-term
insurance POLICY BENEFITS
Arises IF
Assistance, life, disability or health policies, which
apply to insured or their spouse, where they have
been in force for at least THREE YEARS BEFORE the
benefits are paid out.
THEN There are certain Limits on
attachment/execution/insolvency
during lifetime
1. The policy benefits (amount paid out)
cannot be attached by creditors
2. Cannot be subjected to execution.
3. Will not form part of the insolvent estate.
NOTE: THERE ARE LIMITATIONS
1. The amount that is protected is
however capped at 50k.
2. The protection is unavailable if the
benefits have been used to secure a debt.
3. It only covers ASSETS THAT ARE ACQUIRED with the policy
benefits within FIVE YEARS of the policy pay out
MONEY(CASH) IS COVERED FOREVER
S48 LONG-TERM Insurance Act:
Cooling-off periods
Summary of policy must be sent to the insured
party within 60 days of concluding the contract.
From date that summary is received:
Cooling-off period of 30 days
In this, insured has a right to rescind
without reason and without penalty.
UNLESS benefits have already been paid out
in terms of the insurance policy.
If Insured RESCINDS, BROKER LOSES HIS
COMMISSION, AND HAS NO RIGHT OF
RECOURSE AGAINST THE INSURED
NCA
Generally doesn't cover insurance,
EXCEPT FOR CREDIT INSURANCE
Common form of CI is Credit Life Insurance
Cover payable in the event of a consumerās death,
disability, terminal illness, unemployment, or other
insurable risk that is likely to impair the consumerās
ability to meet the obligations under a credit
agreement
Protection for INSURED
1. Against where the cost or nature of
the credit insurance is unreasonable
2. Policy must provide for the payment of premiums
on a monthly basis if small or intermediate credit
agreement. OR on a monthly OR ANNUAL basis if it
is a Large credit agreements (>250k).
3. IF annaul premium is payable (large credit
agreement), the premium must be recovered
from consumer WITHIN THAT YEAR
4. There may NOT any addition of surcharge, fee /
additional premium where CP arranges insurance
5. When CPās are arranging the insurance, they
have to follow the principle of adequate disclosure
6. freedom choice allows consumer to
REJECT the CP's suggested insurance
7. CP is deemed to be a loss payee, and when
insurer pays out, they must pay out to CP FIRST
8. Say premiums are paid in January and
debts owed ito CA are settled in June, then
the consumer is entitled to a
proportionate refund. So in this example,
theyāll get 50% back.
Performance & termination
When may an insurer refuse
to meet an insuredās claim?
1. False claim
2. Failure by the insured to honour
their contractual obligations
3. Material misrepresentation or
non-disclosure by the insured
4. Claim filed out of time
Fraudulent Claims (FORMS):
Exaggeration
Fabrication
Self inflicted loss
Termination
cancellation
(eg due to
breach)
Performance -->
Such as when an
insurance policy
pays out
Expiry of agreed
duration of contract
Supervening impossibility of performance
--> So something happens that prevents the
insurance company from paying out, such
as when they are declared insolvent.
Agreement --> If
parties agree to
terminate.
Insurable
interest lost
--> If car no
longer in
possession.
Double click this node
to edit the text
Click and drag this button
to create a new node
New
0
of
0
Go to link
Track All
Untrack All
4078545
mind_map
2017-08-21T09:09:23Z
You need to log in to complete this action!
Register for Free