If the PM is unable to do physical activities because of a lack of a physical body, then surely this is a limitation, so the PM cannot be unlimited.
If human's purpose is to be like the PM, and the PM's only role is to think about itself, then is it right to selfish? This contrasts with the idea of Eudaimonia, (virtue leading to happiness).
The relationship between the PM and the universe is unclear, as is the idea that the PM causes things to happen by 'thinking.'
The PM is transcendent, and thus unable to interact with the world in the way believers often talk about God's activity in the world.
The PM is also perfect, so it is only able to think about itself and can have no part in our lives.
As such, the PM seems very unloving and distant - would the cause of the universe really be like that?
What moved the Prime Mover? RESPONSE - The PM is unique, because it is the one thing that does not require something to act on it.
Richard Dawkins would also dispute the purpose of the universe, as there is no clear thing that the universe is supposed to do.
Where did the matter in the universe come from?
Aristotle disregards 'spiritual or intuitive knowledge' as unreliable, and confines us to the scientifically demonstrable.
Aristotle's writings are difficult to read and follow, whereas Plato's dialogues are clear.
What about the things in the universe that have no purpose? Or a negative purpose? e.g. what purpose does cancer serve? to replicate as quickly as possible?

	Created by Summer Pearce over 8 years ago

AS - Level (Year 1) Philosophy (1) Ancient Greek Influences on the Philosophy of Religion) Slide Set on Aristotle, created by Summer Pearce on 22/03/2016.