Select from the dropdown lists to complete the text.
Other evaluation points for Clinical interview:
CI produced ( more, less ) accuracy when used in ( Brazil, Barcelona ) compared to standard interview techniques
CI and normal interview techniques tested on ( 72, 54 ) year olds and ( 22, 18 ) year olds - CI was better for both and especially good for the ( elderly, youthful ) (good population validity)
( Difficult, Easy ) to compare studies carried out in different countries because there are many variations on CI
Time consuming
Gieselman - instructions are confusing for under ( 8, 5 )'s and shouldn't be used for this age group