Question 1
Question
Humes refutes the teleological argument in what way
Question 2
Question
2 main points of the first cause argument are...
Answer
-
Anything that exist must have an explanation for why it exists
-
God is an uncaused first cause
-
Everything that exist must be caused
-
everything has a contingent existence
Question 3
Question
According to [blank_start]contingency[blank_end], even if the world had no beginning it would still need a reason to explain its existence.
Question 4
Question
Which of the following is not an objection to the contingency argument?
Answer
-
fallacy of equivocation
-
fallacy of composition
-
infinite regress
-
2 of these
-
none of these
Question 5
Question
...are weaknesses of the ontological argument for God
Answer
-
we can conceive of a logically possible universe where there is no God
-
fallacy of equivocation
-
only shows the properties that are contained in the idea of God
-
not compatible with Darwinism
Question 6
Question
What would Darwin say about design?
Question 7
Question
Which of the following ideas are compatible with the design theory?
Answer
-
many special features of a watch, therefore they were where made by chance
-
nature and particular objects in nature have apparent design,hence these things have a designer
-
natural laws/processes and evolution account for design in natural objects
Question 8
Question
Select which of the following are views a hard determinist would have...
Answer
-
we can have metaphysical freedom
-
no moral responsibility
-
desires and beliefs are based on prior causes
-
Mother Teresa should be praised
-
we can have circumstancial freedom
Question 9
Question
views that a compatibilist wouldn't have...
Answer
-
no circumstantial freedom
-
we need metaphysical freedom to have moral responsibility
-
beliefs and desires are based on prior causes
-
Mother Teresa should be prasied
-
2 of these
Question 10
Question
Views that a libertarian wouldn't have...
Answer
-
no metaphysical freedom
-
no circumstantial freedom
-
beliefs and desires are based on prior causes
-
without metaphysical freedom we lack moral resposibility
Question 11
Question
Which of the following is not a hard determinism attack against Libertarianism?
Answer
-
Fails to Explain the Fact That We Can Influence Other People’s Behavior
-
Requires the Problematic Notion of Uncaused Events
-
Is in Conflict with the Scientific View of the World
-
2 of these
-
none of these
Question 12
Question
a person who says that you are not metaphysically free because your actions are predetermined by the universal laws of causation, therefore we can not be held morally responsible... is likely a compatibilist
Question 13
Question
How would a compatibilist respond to "When I make a choice, I could always have chosen differently"
Question 14
Question
How would a hard determinist "best"respond to "The fact that sometimes I have to deliberate to make a decision proves that I am not
determined"
Question 15
Question
How would a soft determinist respond to "It is impossible to predict another person’s behavior."
Question 16
Question
How would a determinist respond to "When I make a choice, I have the undeniable feeling that the choice is free"