2652754
Descripción
Test por davidhicks42, actualizado hace más de 1 año
|
Creado por davidhicks42
hace alrededor de 9 años
|
|
Pregunta 1
Pregunta
The Plausible Pleading Standard from Twombly is confirmed in what case?
Respuesta
-
Conolly v. Gibson
-
Ashcroft
-
Beck
-
Kroger
Pregunta 2
Pregunta
Which one of these is NOT required in a claim for relief?
Respuesta
-
A demand for relief sought, which may include relief in the alternative or different types of relief.
-
A short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.
-
Facts: time, place , why, circumstances.
Pregunta 3
Pregunta
FRCP (9)(g) states that special damages must be specifically stated. Which of the following is included in special damages?
Respuesta
-
Those damages that would be normally anticipated from a particular event.
-
Those damages that would not normally be anticipated from a certain event.
-
Both A & C.
Pregunta 4
Pregunta
A defendant must serve an answer within 14 days after being served with the summons and complaint.
Respuesta
- True
- False
Pregunta 5
Pregunta
Rule 12(g) does not require a party to file a pre-answer motion. However, if a party chooses to file a pre-answer motion, it must consolidate all available defenses in the motion.
Respuesta
- True
- False
Pregunta 6
Pregunta
The Rule 12(b)(2)-(5) defenses are:
Respuesta
-
lack of Personal Jurisdiction
-
Improper Venue
-
Failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted
-
Insufficient Service of Process
-
Insufficient Process
Pregunta 7
Pregunta
Rule 12(h)(3) permits a court to dismiss an action at any time that the court determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
Respuesta
- True
- False
Pregunta 8
Pregunta
Rule 11 (Care and Candor) requires a pleader to certify, whether by signing, filing, submitting or arguing a motion or pleading, that the pleader has made a reasonable inquiry that the pleading's:
Respuesta
-
Subjective determination of whether Defendant's actions were reasonable.
-
Claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or by a non-frivolous argument for extending, modifying or reversing existing law.
-
Is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation.
-
The denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence, or if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or lack of information
-
Factual contentions have evidentiary support, or if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation.
Pregunta 9
Pregunta
Motions for sanctions must be made under Rule 7.
Respuesta
- True
- False
Pregunta 10
Pregunta
Rule 15(c):
Respuesta
-
Same Transaction or Occurrence Test.
-
Same Nucleus of Operative Fact.
Pregunta 11
Pregunta
Rule 15(c):
Respuesta
-
Same Transaction or Occurrence Test.
-
Same Nucleus of Operative Fact.
¿Quieres crear tus propios Tests gratis con GoConqr? Más información.