Laws 2202 Obligation in Private Law

Lloyds v. Bundy case established the Lloyd test. What was the LLyod test used to determine?

Legal construct, or civil wrong, other than a breach of contract, which the law will redress by an award of damages is what?

According to the RWDSU v. Dolphin case what was the courts findings?

In Canada,as an element of domestic contracts: under the Family Law Act (1990 [2015]), which of the following is not set out

Fiduciary Obligations are obligations that expect reliance on you and expect to be loyal; obligations to act in the interests of another. Strongly associated with notions of trust, loyalty, and reliance of another party.

Click-wrap contract consist of four things:

In L’Estrange v. F Graucaob Ltd., what did the court rule was the distinction between a binding legal contract and the ‘sales agreement’ that the plaintiff signed?

According to the Supreme Court of Canada, as noted in Frame v. Smith, when a plaintiff comes forward with a case where there is no existing cause of action under tort law, the court

Constitutional Values and Private Law does what

Resulting Trust differs from consecutive trust because

Establishes that, in general, the commercial provisioning of alcohol (governed by provincial statute) does produce a prima facie duty of care between the seller and the patron. Further, the standards of care will depend on the details of the situation, and the foreseeability of potential harms. What case established this?

Reaffirms the duty of care owed by commercial hosts, but limits the standard of care required to a certain degree as based on the specifics of the situation. Begins to recognize that standards of care implying positive action should be considered the highest standards, and are appropriate only when harm is truly foreseeable. Was established by what case?

The courts ruling put agreements and promises made verbally inside a family unit outside the purview of formal contract law – unless they were to conform to the classic ‘form’ of the contract. Was established by what case?

Established the way in which the court views contracts mediated by machines, and the requisite notice and ‘moment in time’ where terms and conditions would need to be provided in order for them to be an enforceable component of said contractual arrangement. Was established by what case?

The case upheld the validity of the very broad exclusionary clause, despite the fact the plaintiff had not been aware of the clause at the time she signed the agreement. The judge did, however, note that the contract ought to have been in clearer language, and that it was unfortunate that the clause in question was not in larger print.

In Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co. (1962), the important issue the court considered was:

Establishes, and enshrines in the Constitution, fundamental rights and freedoms subject only to the limits that can be demonstrated as justifiable in a free and democratic society is what ?

What are the steps a court takes in order to test whether or not a contract has been breached?

Functions of tort law

If someone runs over your foot due to a faulty break who is awarded damages and what type of damages will they be awarded?

As set out in the cases reviewed, and in lecture, the three essential elements for determining unjust enrichment are:

“You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour. Who, then, in law, is my neighbour? The answer seems to be – persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought reasonably to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called in question.” The above quotation comes from which of the following cases:

Private law is characterized by a series of codified rules (or doctrines) which are applied and interpreted by courts on issues including torts, contract disputes, and matters of equity (unjust enrichment, fiduciary duties).