Cases for Theft (A-Level Law AQA)

Pregunta	Respuesta
Section 1(1) Theft Act 1968	D dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with intention to permanently deprive
R v Morris	Appropriation is compared against the reasonable man
DPP v Gomez/R v Hinks	Is consent a defence?
Section 5(1) Theft Act 1968	Belonging to another: having possession/control/right/interest
Turner	Distinguish between ownership and control
Webster	Right or interest in property
AG Ref No 1	Property gained by mistake
Section 2(1) Theft Act 1968	3 circumstances in which D was NOT dishonest
1. R v Small 2. R v Holden 3. R v Thurborn	1. D believes he has a right to deprive 2. D believes he has consent to 'borrow' 3. D believes he cannot find owner through reasonable steps
Feely	Could be dishonest even if willing to pay
Ivey V Genting Casinos	Impact on Ghosh Test
Easom	Disposal of property or owner's rights

Resumen del Recurso

	Creado por Jessica Williams hace más de 5 años