1865540
Descripción
Fichas por Juantxo aka Dave , actualizado hace más de 1 año
|
|
Creado por Juantxo aka Dave
hace casi 10 años
|
|
| Pregunta | Respuesta |
| Farrington et. al - Disrupted families Upbringing | Longitudinal 411 boys, aged 8-9, East London Aged 48, 365 interviewed Number of offences peaked at 17 161 had convictions 7% chronic offenders - half of offences Disrupted family, young mother, convicted parent |
| Sutherland - Learning from others Upbringing | Criminal behaviour is learned Occurs within intimate personal groups Learned from definitions of legal codes Becomes delinquent because of an excess of definitions to violation of law |
| Wikstrom - Poverty and disadvantages neighbourhoods Upbringing | 100x more likely to have multiple problems 2000 year 10 students 44.8% M / 30.6% F committed 1+ crime in 2000 Social situation, lifestyles and routine Propensity-induced, Lifestyle-dependent Situationally-limited |
| Yochelson and Samenow- Criminal thinking patters Cognition | Spanned 14 years, 255 male participants Half guilty but insane - sent to hospital Lack empathy, dissatisfied, poor decision-making 30 completed programme, 9 changed. Participants lied, thinking patterns ASPD 52 thinking patters, not unique to criminals |
| Kohlberg - Moral development and crime Cognition | 58 boys from Chicago, aged 7-16 2-hour interview with 10 dilemmas. 3-yearly intervals up to 30-36 Pre-morality (Stage 1+2) Conventional morality (Stage 3+4) Post-conventional morality (Stage 5+6) No support for stage 6 |
| Gudjonsson and Bownes - Attribution of blame Cognition | 42-item GBAI (Blame attribution Inventory) 80 criminals in Northern Ireland 20-Violent, 40-Sex offenders, 20-Property Most guilt - Sex, Violent External - Violent, least for sex Strong consistency with English findings |
¿Quieres crear tus propias Fichas gratiscon GoConqr? Más información.