Creado por Tells Bell
hace casi 10 años
|
||
Pregunta | Respuesta |
Ormsby v CCSP - scots law | courts were wary due to the possibility of falsified illness/evidence |
Page v Smith | accident caused recurrence of CFS - claim if physical damage foreseeable |
Dulieu v White | early instance - feared for own life - horse and cart and pub and kid |
Chadwick v British Railway Board | rescuers were originally given preferential treatment as primary victims - reasonable foreseeability of rescuers |
McLoughlin v O'Brain | secondary victim criteria not met - not foreseeable or proximate |
Alcock | criteria for secondary victims - close tie of love and affection - own eyes - event or immediate aftermath - single shocking event |
McFarlane v EE Caledonia | just a bystander -no liability - reasonable fortitude not foreseeable |
Vernon v Bosely | recognised psychiatric injury |
Greatorex v Greatorex | no duty owed by primary victim to secondary victim |
Hinz v Berry | not just grief |
White | must be in zone of danger Hillsborough - not police |
Sion | single traumatic event not long drawn out angst |
¿Quieres crear tus propias Fichas gratiscon GoConqr? Más información.