Pregunta | Respuesta |
What was the aim of the study? | To see how many people will comply with an unethical request and how many will respond by 'whistle-blowing' to a higher authority. A secondary aim was to compare actual rates of disobedience and whistle-blowing to estimated rates. |
What was Bocchiaro's method? | 149 students were given an unethical request, to write a statement designed to convince other students to participate in a traumatic sensory deprivation experiment. Participants were then left alone to see what they would do. In a separate procedure, 138 students were told about the scenario and asked both what they would do, and what they thought the average student will do. |
What were his results? | When questioned most participants said they would report the unethical experiment and that the average student would disobey. However, 76.5% actually obeyed and only 9.4% 'blew the whistle'. |
What conclusions did Bocchiaro make? | Although most people believe they will disobey unethical instructions and report unethical conduct, in practice the majority comply with unethical instructions. |
Participants? | All participants were undergraduates students from the VU University of Amsterdam. Ninety-two people took part in the pilot studies, and a further 149 in the main experiment procedure (96 women and 53 men, with a mean age of 20.8 years). |
¿Quieres crear tus propias Fichas gratiscon GoConqr? Más información.