Creado por Chantal Briancon
hace más de 8 años
|
||
Pregunta | Respuesta |
Illegality | Lord Diplock defined illegality in GCHQ as 'the decision-maker must understand correctly the law that regulates his decision-making power and must give effect to it'. |
Simple ultra vires | This form of illegality is where the public authority in question simply acts outside of their powers - therefore, they are acting ultra vires. |
ATTORNEY GENERAL V FULHAM CORPORATION | Although the local authority had the power to set up a wash room, they did not have the power to create a laundry service. Therefore, they acted ultra vires. |
WESTMINSTER CORPORATION V LONDON AND NORTH WEST RAILWAY | A public authority will not have acted unlawfully if it did something that was reasonably incidental to or consequent upon a power that it did have. |
AG V WILTS UNITED DIARIES | Article 6 of the Bill of Rights 1688 states that a public body can only raise taxes if it is specifically permitted by statute to do so. |
Error of law. | This is where the public authority misinterprets the legislative rules under which it has claimed to have act. |
ANSIMINIC LIMITED V FOREIGN COMPENSATION COMMISSION | Example of an error of law. |
PERILLY V TOWER HAMLET BOROUGH COUNCIL | Example of an error of law. |
Error of fact. | The courts will quash a decision where the authority has incorrectly evaluated a fact that is essential for deciding whether or not it has certain powers. |
EDWARDS V BAIRSTOW | An error of fact can be found where the factual finding was perverse or there was no evidence to support it. |
EX PARTA KHAWAJA | An error of fact can be found where a precedent fact is an issue - this is where a factual situation must exist before the public authority can act. |
E V SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT | A decision can be challenged on the ground that there has been a mistake of fact giving rise to unfairness. |
UNLAWFUL DELEGATION | A power must be exercised by the authority whom it has been conferred and by no-one else. Where powers have been conferred by statute, the general rule is that they may not be delegated unless that delegation is authorised by the law. |
BARNARD V NATIONAL DOCK LABOUR BOARD | The delegation of power was held to be ultra vires on the basis that such function could not lawfully be delegated to another. |
CORLTONA V WORKS COMMISSION | Powers and duties that have been conferred on a government minister may be exercised, on his behalf, by his civil servants within his department. |
R V BIRMINGHAM JUSTICES | The principle was expanded stating an office holder, has the ability to discharge all but the most important of his functions through suitable subordinates. |
SECTION 101 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 | This states that a local authority can arrange for its functions to be discharged by its committee or officers or other local authorities. |
Fettering discretion | A public authority must not refuse to exercise its powers or unlawfully impose limits, through policies, of its freedoms to act under these powers. |
EX PARTE KYNOCH LIMITED | A public authority can introduce its own internal policies or rules to guide and regulate its own decision making - it must be prepared to keep an open mind. |
BRITISH OXYGEN COMPANY V BOARD OF TRADE | An example of fettering discretion. |
R V NORTH WEST LANCASHIRE HEALTH AUTHORITY | Example of fettering discretion. |
Relevancy | When reaching a decision, a public authority must ensure that it takes into account all considerations that are relevant to that decision. |
EX PARTE VENABLES | The Home Secretary could take into account public confidence in the justice system but not public petitions, public opinions or campaigns. |
EX PARTE WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL | A decision will not be unlawful if it was insignificant or operated in favour of the claimant. |
Improper purpose | A public authority can only use its powers for the purposes for which they were conferred by the empowering legislation. |
WEBB V MINISTER OF HOUSING AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT | A local authority had the power to acquire land to construct coastal defences but could not acquire the land for purposes of building a promenade. |
EX PARTE WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL | Where the power is used for a proper and improper purpose, the authorise purpose will be the dominant purpose that materially influenced the decision. |
PORTER V MAGILL | The real objective of the Conservative local authority's policy was not to sell council houses but to secure more votes. |
WHEELER V LEICESTER CITY COUNCIL | The judiciary will ensure that a public authority does not use its power for a purpose that they deem to violate standards of good administration. |
¿Quieres crear tus propias Fichas gratiscon GoConqr? Más información.