62564
Descripción
Fichas por katy_mcbride12, actualizado hace más de 1 año
|
Creado por katy_mcbride12
hace alrededor de 11 años
|
|
| Pregunta | Respuesta |
| Diligence is strictis iuris | Atlas Appointments (No2) v Tinsley |
| Grant by inhibitee is not voluntary if already concluded missives | Halifax v Smith |
| Land adjudication – if sold, excess is given to debtor | Hull v Campbell |
| Arrestable – shares | Sinclair v Staples |
| arrestable - contingent liability | Boland v White Cross Insurance |
| arrestable - goods in possession of a third party | Moore & Weinberg |
| Social security payments are not arrestable even if in a bank account | North Lanarkshire Council v Crossen |
| Diligence on the dependence – not compatible with ECHR | karl Construction |
| diligence on the dependence - Swing back to pursuer(?) | McCormick v Hamilton Academics FC |
| Requirements for common law challenge | Nordic Travel v Scotprint |
¿Quieres crear tus propias Fichas gratiscon GoConqr? Más información.