Conflicting Perspectives: Julius Caesar + V for Vendetta

Descripción

Mapa Mental sobre Conflicting Perspectives: Julius Caesar + V for Vendetta, creado por perzellalui el 13/08/2014.
perzellalui
Mapa Mental por perzellalui, actualizado hace más de 1 año
perzellalui
Creado por perzellalui hace más de 10 años
212
1

Resumen del Recurso

Conflicting Perspectives: Julius Caesar + V for Vendetta
  1. JULIUS CAESAR: Individual responses towards the process of searching for the true and moral leadership thus revealing CP in what is to be considered an “honest” and “noble” leader
    1. “Caesar shall go forth” because “Danger knows full well that Caesar is more dangerous than he”
      1. “O noble Caesar! ... We will be revenged!”
        1. Irony of Brutus’ “honourable” decision to conspire against his “good friend”
          1. “Et tu, Brute!” drives a chaos of emotions
            1. “For Brutus is an honourable man” questions the reason for this murder
              1. “not that [he] loved Caesar less but that [he] loved Rome more” Caesar’s true leadership ambitions were unrevealed
                1. “Caesar, now be still: I kill'd not thee with half so good a will” reveal mixed opinions
                  1. challenges the values of leadership through the meaning of nobility and honour, which comes to a crux at Caesar’s death
                  2. JULIUS CAESAR: Vs can influence their p on soc. as well as - instilled familial upbringings of abiding by the republic government
                    1. third person, “Than that poor Brutus with himself at war”
                      1. envisions Caesar metaphorically ascending upon ‘ambitions ladder’ symbolic of his concern with JC'
                        1. Conversely, Brutus holds ‘no personal cause to spurn at him’, personal reluctance
                          1. anchor statement for his future actions; “I slew by my best lover for the good of Rome, I have the same dagger for myself when it shall please my country to need my death” foreshadowing
                            1. ghost of Caesar becomes a spiritual omen
                              1. Even Antony regards Brutus as “a man”, “the noblest Roman of them all”
                              2. V FOR VENDETTA: Diverging values moral leadership
                                1. surfaces F vs. A with an underlying discussion
                                  1. shadowed c-u introducing V - secretive figure; his following l.shot - his wide steady stance presents him as a typical hero
                                    1. mysterious saviour that “means [her] no harm” vs. his controversial mocking act -“Old Bailey”
                                      1. settled in his contrasting view which “Violence can be used for good… justice”
                                        1. morals being enforced on “all the televisions in London” ... fostering a sense of irony to 21th century sensitive topics of “immigrants, Muslims, homosexuals” and “terrorists”
                                          1. Government “promised order” and “peace” he “demanded in return your silent, obedient consent” restricting individuality and originality
                                            1. dark room - (similar to Caesar), a sense of open-ended mystery about his leadership intentions
                                            2. V FOR VENDETTA:V’s traumatic past, which ignites his raging ambition to overrule the current dictatorship
                                              1. labelled a “terrorist” and personal aversion against the government his deep passion for justice - revolutionary freedom fighter
                                                1. empowering final scene with a wide, overlooking panning shot of London flooded with people dressed in V’s attire
                                                  1. magnificent victory is “never to be forgot” - his destructive plan throughout the film challenge the audience’s p
                                                    1. murders of the government officials, political dissidence and the destruction of parliament
                                                      1. torturous experience in which Evey (whom he cares for) suffers despite being for her own good
                                                        1. his intentions (similarly to Brutus) are questionable
                                                          1. questioned through conflicting arguments to challenge the audience to reconsider their values of typical leaders
                                                          Mostrar resumen completo Ocultar resumen completo

                                                          Similar

                                                          Tablas de multiplicar
                                                          Carmen Giralda
                                                          ANTIGUO RÉGIMEN
                                                          Víctor Molinero
                                                          Faltas de Orotografía
                                                          Diego Santos
                                                          Etapas de la Historia de España
                                                          Alba B
                                                          Pasos para la ejecución de un emprendimiento
                                                          lamconsultoria
                                                          FARMACOLOGÍA CARDIOVASCULAR
                                                          may.856
                                                          Códigos de la principales aerolíneas
                                                          Diego Santos
                                                          TEORIAS ADMINISTRATIVAS DE TAYLOR Y FAYOL
                                                          Elan Bolaños
                                                          OPERACIONES CON POLINOMIOS
                                                          Leticia Pérez Nicolás
                                                          PRINCIPIO DE OPORTUNIDAD DEL MINISTERIO PÚBLICO ART. 256
                                                          ConsentidadeDios
                                                          LA DIVERSIDAD CULTURAL
                                                          ramiroosoriorubi