Majority of experiments to
develop new medicines and test
the safety of other products
Many experiments only
involve minor procedures (e.g
a change of diet). Those
requiring more invasive
procedures are given pain
relief if appropriate.
Animals are
humanely destroyed
after experimentation
What are the
ethical issues?
Slippery Slope
lead to the creation of hybrid
embryos? and then the creation of
human-hybrid embryos?
cloning
Stewardship
'Stewards to the earth, to
rule over the fish of the
sea and the birds of the
sky'
created to look after the
earth, not to cause pain and
suffering
What rights do
the animals
have?
Equal rights to humans - e.g. Peter Singer
No rights - e.g. Kant,
Carl Cohen
Some rights, but not equal to humans - Tom Regan
Alternatives
Cell cultures
Brain recording
techniques e.g. MRI,
PET, CT
Microdosing - giving humans
small doses of the drug to
collect information about how it
is metabolised, and how safe it
is - has not been fully validated
as an alternative yet
Animal testing is the best method
Large sample
Interaction between drug and entire body can be seen
Examples
Banting and Best: discovery
of insulin in dogs in the
1920s led to treatment for
both diabetic humans and
dogs.
2012- less than 0.5% of experiments
were on cats, dogs and primates
(senient organisms). 99% of
experiments were on birds, reptiles,
fish and rodents (insenient organisms).
90% of
veterinary
medicines
are the same
or very
similar to
human
medicines
Scholars and Quotes
Immanuel Kant
'Animals are not
self-conscious and are
there merely as means to
an end'
Animals cannot reason,
and therefore the
categorical imperative does
not apply to them
Indirect duties
towards animals
'Must practice kindness
towards animals, for he
who is cruel to animals
become hard also in his
dealings with men'
Can use consequentialist
reasoning, as we have no
direct duties towards
animals
Carl Cohen
Animals have no moral
significance or rights
(ability to make moral
claims), as they do not
have intellectual
attributes
Criticism - human beings, e.g.
babies and brain damaged people,
cannot make moral claims and thus
must also lack rights
Peter Singer
All creatures
should be
given moral
significance
'Speciesism' - belief that the
interests of one's own
species are more important
that interests of another
The same experiments, with the same
amount of suffering, should be
performed on human, or no experiments
should be performed at all
Proponent of preference
Utilitarianism, therefore
interesting in the pain and
pleasure an action will bring
'a being is not
capable of suffering,
or of enjoyment, there
is nothing to be taken
into account'
Religious Views
'A humans being may
be worth many sparrows,
but even a sparrow does
not die unnoticed'
Roman Catholic
Catechism - 'animal
experiments are morally
acceptable'
Other Denominations
Rev. Anne
Wilkinson-Hayes (baptist) -
'most baptists would be
sympathetic towards the
use of animals in medical
research, but less
enthusiastic towards their
use in cosmetic products'