October 1462 - Margaret of Anjou and Lancastrians (Sir Henry Beaufort,
third Duke of Somerset and Pierre de Breze)landed near Bramburgh,
Northumberland. Reinforced small garrison at Bamburgh Castle held by
Sir Richard Tunstall. 'Sir Ralph Grey of Heton & Chillingham, who had
temporarily turned coat for the Yorkists and was entrusted with
Dunstanburgh Castle, turned coat back in favour of the Lancastrians, and
gave them back DUnstamburgh which they further garrissoned'. After only
short siege Alnwick Castle too surrendered due to a shortage of supplies.
Now they possessed the three great castles of northern Northumbria
Nota:
Wm. E. Baumgaertner - Squires, Knights, Barons, Kings: War and Politics in Fifteenth Century England, Henry Beaufort, third Duke of Somerset Lancastrian Military Commander
This was a serious threat. 3rd Somerset
had led Lancastrians in Battles of
Wakefield (Jan 1461), 2nd Battle of St
Albans (17 Feb 1461), and at defeat
Battle of Towton (April 1461). Fled to
Scotland with MoA, and other
Lancastrian Notables e.g. Sir Henry
Holland 2nd Duke of Exeter
Seneschal of Normandy = Pierre
Dealt with by Sir John Neville. Battle of Hexham destroyed last of Lancastrian force (15 May
1464). Captured Most of Lancastrian Commanders some of which were executed like 3rd
Somerset 'With Somersets death the Lancastrians lost there most effective field commander'
Nota:
Squire, Knights, Barons, Kings:etc...SAME AS BEFORE
Treaty of York 1464/Treaty with Scotland
The North was an area of particular weakness.
Ed was consistently reluctant to travel to the
North. E.g. after the victory of Towton. Ed went
straight South rather than consolidating his
power to the far north while all his army was
there although he might have felt attention
was needed more down south
'Had Edward asserted his authority early on and not
been reliant on his personality to control the nobility he
would've seen less rebellion throughout his reign'
Should he have executed Henry VI. This would have eliminated the
figurehead and lessened the Lancastrian cause minimising the problem. BUT
could have caused problems in itself. Would have created a matyr, and there
was still Young Prince Ed and could have caused problems in itself
'As long as the head of the House of Lancaster was at liberty, the Yorkists
could never be confident of their hold on the throne. There was always an
alternative King to whom dissidents could turn with a clear concience'
Nota:
A. J. Pollard - Late Medieval England 1399-1509, the First Reign of Edward IV, p273
However when MOA invaded in 1462 failed
to gain support. Problem was of foreign help
not lancastrians. Suggests Ed successfully
reduced threat of domestic rebellion
Ed had a strong desire for conciliation,
which he perhaps took too far. 'Anyone
who showed a willingness to cooperate
was given his chance, whatever the risks
implied by his previous record'
Nota:
Charles Derek Ross - Edward IV, p45
Lawrence Booth - Bishop of Durham, appointed as his confessor
despite having a close relationship with MoA
Sir Thomas Tuddenham - 'formerly keeper of the wardrobe and
treasurer of the household to Henry VI, who had been deeply involved
with the Dukes of Suffolk and Somerset, escaped attainder, as did his
collaborator, John Heydon, who received a general pardon in April 1462'
Nota:
Charles Derek Ross - Edward IV , p42
'Gangs of seditious vagabonds roamed through many midland and southern
regions, accused of killing, despoiling and oppressing the king's subjects'
Nota:
Charles Derek Ross - Edward IV, p42
Efficiently
Sacked Lancastrian office holders
WKs lands after rebellion and death.
Simultaneously extended crowns influence
in local area and rewarded allegiance. Gave
significant amount to Brother George as
reward for switching allegiance back from
H7 and MoA. Remainder went to Duke of
Gloucester contributing to the creation of a
northern power base and extending royal
authority in an area affected by Scottish
conflict
His father had treated the nobles harshly, which had led to a
lack of support which caused him to lose Battle of Ludford
Bridge 1459 and Battle of Wakefield 1460 (where he would die)
Dangers of rewarding nobility too much already proven to be an issue in H7 reign
Created the position of Overlord -
these were effective
Hastings was an overlord, positioned to control Buckingham
'In spite of the strength of Lancastrian sympathies in Yorkshire,
the country offered no resistance to Edward after Towton'
Nota:
Charles Derek Ross - Edward IV, p45
12 February 1462 - Series of commissions appointed to arrest active rebels and enquire into
treasons and rebellions. 23 barons, 10 judges to investigate in 25 counties and 8 cities
Uncovered Lancastrian plot headed by Earl of Oxford, Aubrey de Vere
(his son) and Sir Thomas Tuddenham - Exectuted on Tower Hill
'It could be argued that the policy of reconciliation helped the
new regime to survive its first fragile years'
Nota:
A. J. Pollard - Late Medieval England 1399-1509, the First Reign of Edward IV, The New Regime, p273
WK appeared to support reconciliation to some extent. Ed
reconciled with bitter enemy Duke of Somerset and WK
reconciled with bitter enemies Ralph Percy and Humphrey Neville
Henry VI had favourites
'After Edward IV returned to the throne in 1471, the dynamic between him
and his nobles contrasted greatly with the ineffective management of Henry
VI's impotent reign, as Edward tightened control over the seemingly
unwieldy nobility. This addition of a central authority figure, after an
essentially leaderless period, provided a necessary point of stability, as
nobles had previously asserted their own claims to power in an attempt to
remedy the power void at the head of the body politic'
Nota:
Emily Glassford - Post-1471 'New Monarchy' under Edward IV and Henry VII, p5
Cades Rebellion 1450
Led by Jack Cade against the principles of Henry VI
reign. Mainly peasants and small landowners from
Kent who were objected to forced labour, corrupt
courts, the seizure of land by nobles, the loss of royal
lands in France an Heavy taxation. Were welcomed
into London after defeating government force sent to
destroy them although after the violent behaviour of
Cades men the city turned against them
Mob was pardoned by King along with Cade
(although he was later killed by Sheriff of Kent)
William De la Pole - Earl of Suffolk
Knight of Garter 1422
Royal Counsellor and Steward of Royal Household
quickly after coming to court in 1430
by 1447 Practically Ran government - although would fall
from power as Scapegoat for loss of lands in France
Edmund Beaufort- 2nd Duke of Somerset
1448 - Made Duke of Somerset
Blamed for English losses in France
Rumoured to be father of Prince Ed of Lancaster
CONCLUSION
Ultimately Ed must have secured the overall
support of his nobility by 1469. Although he
was locked away and Warwick ruling at his
palace, the nobility still wouldn't rise to
support WK against the rebellions in the
North. WK was forced to let Ed go.
Won many Friends especially in London
Rewarded Yorkists, Made George
Neville Archbishop of York 1467
Day after coronation Edwards principal followers were ennobled;
Viscount Bourgenier became Earl of Essex and Lord Fauconberg
became Earl of Kent. Leading Yorkist Retainers made Barons; Sir
Walter Deveraux (as Lord Ferrers), Sir William Hastings, Sir William
Herbert and Sir Humphrey Stafford of Southwick etc.
London was essential to controlling England. 'All the structural changes in the 15th century enhanced the
dominance of London as the focal point of the English Economy'. It was the only English city that could
compete with the Great European cities of Italy and France, and at around 40, 000 was at least four times
larger than the principal provincial cities of Biristol, Norwich, York
Nota:
A. J. Pollard - Late Medieval England 1399-1509, p180