null
US
Iniciar Sesión
Regístrate Gratis
Registro
Hemos detectado que no tienes habilitado Javascript en tu navegador. La naturaleza dinámica de nuestro sitio requiere que Javascript esté habilitado para un funcionamiento adecuado. Por favor lee nuestros
términos y condiciones
para más información.
Siguiente
Copiar y Editar
¡Debes iniciar sesión para completar esta acción!
Regístrate gratis
2744252
Mens rea and Actus reus
Descripción
Mapa Mental sobre Mens rea and Actus reus, creado por B_Candice el 16/05/2015.
Sin etiquetas
law
ifp
criminal
mens
rea
actus
reus
2015
Mapa Mental por
B_Candice
, actualizado hace más de 1 año
Más
Menos
Creado por
B_Candice
hace más de 9 años
424
1
0
Resumen del Recurso
Mens rea and Actus reus
Actus Reus
Guilty act
Must be voluntary
Involuntary: insanity or automatism
Action/Conduct
The act itself, no consequences
Perjury - Theft - Making off without payment - Rape - Possession of drugs or a firearm
State of affairs
Circumstances (sometimes consequences)
consists of 'being' rather than 'doing'
Omission
The general rule regarding omissions is that there is no liability for a failure to act.
Exceptions
Statutory duty
Contractual duty
Duty imposed by law
Creating a dangerous situation and failing to put it right
R v Miller1982
Assumption of responsibility
Misconduct in a public office
Murder and manslaughter can be committed as an omission, but assault cannot
Omission or act?
Continuing acts
Fagan v MPC 1969
Result
The conduct itself may not be criminal, but the result of the conduct may be.
Assault - Battery - ABH - Wounding and GBH - Murder & Manslaughter - Criminal damage
Guilty mind
Subjective
defendant's perspective - What was he thinking
Objective
What a reasonable person would have thought
When is not required is strict liability
intention
Having a good motive does not prevent from intention
Direct intent
Consequence is desired
Oblique intent
Consequence is not desired, but known
oblique intent it would be concerned only with whether the defendant did foresee the degree of probability of the result occurring from his actions
recklessness
R v G and another
Recklessness always require a subjective test
negligence
Negligence is determinated according to an objective test
gross negligence manslaughter
R v Adomako [1994]
Mostrar resumen completo
Ocultar resumen completo
¿Quieres crear tus propios
Mapas Mentales
gratis
con GoConqr?
Más información
.
Similar
Contract Law
sherhui94
How Parliament Makes Laws
harryloftus505
A-Level Law: Theft
amyclare96
AQA AS LAW, Unit 1, Section A, Parliamentary Law Making 1/3
Nerdbot98
Law Commission 1965
ria rachel
The Criminal Courts
thornamelia
A2 Law: Cases - Defence of Insanity
Jessica 'JessieB
A2 Law: Special Study - Robbery
Jessica 'JessieB
Omissions
ameliathorn0325
AS Law Jury Case Quiz
Fionnghuala Malone
Criminal Law
jesusreyes88
Explorar la Librería