It is an ineffable experience, a Mysterium Tremendum
An awareness, feeling or sensation that is directly in the mind
Indirect
The mind of the individual focuses on God
People are inspired by the beauty of nature
Swinburme
Public Experiences
Ordinary
Natural events have
reigious significance
Extraordinary
Experiences that violate
the workings of nature
Private Experiences
Describable
Dreams
Non-desribable
God is revealed
beyond description
Non-specific
Looking st the world from
a religious perspective
Visions
God or the divine is
'seen' or 'observed'.
Information may be
relealed
Teresa of Avila
Nota:
"saw Christ at my side - or, to put it better, I was conscious of Him, for neither with the eyes of the body or of the soul did I see anything"
Intellectual experience,
meaning what is seen is an
experience rather than
observation
St Bernadette of Lourdes
Nota:
She was told to dig in the ground at the feet of Mary. Upon doing so, she discovered a mountain spring.
Corporeal vision
because Bernadette
sees Mary as a form
or image
Joseph
Nota:
Told in a dream not to be afraid of marrying MAry even though she is pregnant.
Imaginative vision,
a message from
God through a
dream
Voices
Communication
of knowledge
Usually specific
Nota:
For example when God calls Samuel to be a prophet. In the baptism of Jesus when God's voice declares Jesus as his son.
The voice is disembodied and
shows the presence of God
The voice communicates a
relalation from God
Nota:
The message is said to be noetic, meaning it reveals something og God and God's wishes.
The voice is authoritative and
passess on God's authority
Nota:
"You are my beloved Son, with you i am well pleased." (Mark 1:11)
Teresa of Avila had
criteria to determine if the
voice is God
1. Does the experience
fit in with Christian
Church teaching?
2. Does the experience
leave you at peace with
the world and God?
Conversion
A complete inner transformation
that is empirically verifiable
through the chaged or reformed
behaviour of the individual in
their life
Edwin Starbuck
Nota:
Conversion experiences are not really that dissimilar to the normal phases of identity that people go through.
Corporate Religious Experiences
Experience that happens
simultaneously to a number of people
Toronto Blessing
Nota:
January 1994 at the Toronto Airport Vineyard Church. Participants in the conferences and meetings have reported healings, incidents of personal transformation and a greater awareness of God's love in their lives. Leaders of the meetings and participants claim that these are physical manifestations of the Holy Spirit's presencce and power.
Hank Hanegraaff
Are Religious Experiences Veridical of God?
People, generally speaking are more likely to
believe something if it has been experienced.
Jonathon Edwards
Nota:
"The degree in which our experience is productive in practice shows the degree in which our evidence is spiritual and divine."
Swinburne
Two criteria for studying religious experiences
The Principle of 'Credulity'
With other things being equal, we have good
reason to believe what a person tells us
There are three reasons why one could disbelieve evidence
If we have strong reasons to challenge God's
existence, it undermines the experience as 'religious'
Evidence could
suggest it was not
caused by God
There may be reasons to
believe the person was
mistaken, e.g. under the
influence
The Principle of 'Testimony'
It is reasonable to
believe that what
someone tells you
You may find it unusual or investigate further, but wouldn't automatically reject what they say
William Alston
Whether it is possible to
speak of a person
experiencing God and
gaining knowledge from
the experience
He argued that in normal life the
evidence of something is what you
can gather from experience
E.g. referring to something you've
observed via senses. You are not doubted
because others may have shared in that
Religious experiences are sense
perceptions and there is no need to reject
is just because it may seem unusual
Other sense observations can
determine something's
verifiability, so can we really
reject people's religious
experiences on the same gounds?
William James
Aims to survey the various types of
religious experiences as a psychologist
and to present the findings and its
implications for philosophy in his work
'The Varieties of Religious Experience'
"the feelings, acts, and experiences of
individual men in their solitude, so far as they
apprehend themselves to stand in relation to
whatever they may consider the divine"
These feelings, acts and experiences are shaped, and the
revelation of facts and knowledge aid this. Religion
requires intellectual commitment, for the receiver to
actively engage with the requirements of religious belief
For James, it's important to note that when it comes
to engaging with religion, we do not simply interpret
existing facts but may even be given new ones
Nota:
"Religion... is not a mere illumination of facts already...given, not a mere passion, like love, which views things in a rosier light. It is indeed that... but it is something more, namely a postulator of new facts as well."
The 'prothets of all the different religions' for example, can certainly help construct our perceptions
an outlook towards faith, and in turn sustain it. Those among us not touched by these experiences
and traditions will stand outside of them, noting that they can be used to validate a variety of beliefs.
Religious experience stands at the heart of religion.
Teaching, practices and attitudes are secondary and
develop later as individuals commit themselves
James suggested that religious experiences were events which were
'solitary' and in which individuals experiences the divine or God.
James viewed conversion as a transformation from a
divided or imperfect self to a more unified consciousness
Some felt these experiences
were a psychological
disorder, though James
challenged this and placed
experiences as central to
understanding religion
Any mystical experience,
which he understood to be
the direct revelation of God
and union with the divine,
contain four characteristics
Ineffability
Nota:
Experiences that are beyond the capacity of words to describe.
Noetic
Nota:
Experience is a state of knowledge, but a type of knowledge beyond normal experience.
Transciency
Nota:
The experiences in themselves last only the briefest of time, but their effects are life-changing.
Passivity
Nota:
People affected feel as if their own will is in abeyance (been set aside) as if in the grip of a superior power.
James often cited the case study of Teresa of Avila
Conclusions
James did not accept
religious experiences to be
unquestionably true, but
that they could be indicative
of God.
Religious experiences are psychological
phenomena that occur in our brains but may
have a supernatural element as well as a physical
one.
Empiricism
Nota:
The effects of religious experiences produces empirical evidence. This evidence points towards a higher reality beyond what we see and hear.
Pluralism
Nota:
Experiences were similar across different faiths.
Pragmatism
Nota:
The truth was not always fixed and truth is determined by what is of great value for us.
Challenges and expansions of James' Argument
"Where there is contradiction
there cannot be truth"
"Religious experiences are
the product of a faulty mind"
"In the natural sciences and industrial
arts, it never occurs to anyone to try to
refute opinions by showing up their
author's neurotic constitution."
Dr. H. M. Maudsley
Nota:
"What rights have we to believe Nature is under any obligation to do her work by complete minds only?"
"Religious experiences
are induced"
"The drunken consciousness
is one bit of the mystic
consciousness, and our total
opinion of it must find its
place in our opinion of that
larger whole"
"Religious experiences are emotionally driven
and no more that a personal response"
There is no problem with it being emotional, and
establishes the connection between thought and
action. Feelings associated with religion and the
conduct inspired by those feelings are similar
Irrespective of the
religion studied you
would find two
universal areas