null
US
Iniciar Sesión
Regístrate Gratis
Registro
Hemos detectado que no tienes habilitado Javascript en tu navegador. La naturaleza dinámica de nuestro sitio requiere que Javascript esté habilitado para un funcionamiento adecuado. Por favor lee nuestros
términos y condiciones
para más información.
Siguiente
Copiar y Editar
¡Debes iniciar sesión para completar esta acción!
Regístrate gratis
2901209
Criminal Damage: S1 Criminal Damage Act 1971
Descripción
GCSE (Unit 4) Law Mapa Mental sobre Criminal Damage: S1 Criminal Damage Act 1971, creado por beccehjane el 07/06/2015.
Sin etiquetas
law
criminal law
gcse
law
unit 4
gcse
Mapa Mental por
beccehjane
, actualizado hace más de 1 año
Más
Menos
Creado por
beccehjane
hace alrededor de 9 años
87
2
0
Resumen del Recurso
Criminal Damage: S1 Criminal Damage Act 1971
S1(1) Basic Criminal Damage
AR
Destroys/damages
destroyed: 'when made useless'
damaged: 'if expense and time is incurred in fixing it'
Roe v Kingerlee, 'matter of fact and degree'
Samuel v Stubbs, by 'nature and the mode' in which it is affected/treated
Fiak, impairment of Value/Usefulness
Hardman, non permanent damage still can be CD
Morphitis, scratch doesn't affect ordinary use
Gayford v Chouler, even slight damage was sufficient to prove damage
A v R, no costs/effort to wipe off, not CD
Property Belonging to another
S10(1) 'includes personal/real property, money and animals'
S10(2) 'includes any person having custody/control, any person having a propietary right/interest and any person having a charge on it'
MR
Intention/Recklessness
Pembilton, intention to damage property
Smith, intend to damage property but I believes property is his, then no offence
Test: Did D take an unjustified risk that property would be destroyed/damaged? Did he realise the risk?
Lawful Excuse
act defines two more defences S5(2)(a) and S5(2)(b)
S5(2)(a) Denton, he believes that the owner would have consented to damage
Jaggard v Dickinson, even if honest belief was formed while intoxicated the defence S5(2)(a) still applies
S5(2)(b) Merchett, he believes other property was at risk and in need of immediate protection and D acted reasonably
Hunt, S5(2)(b) not in need of immediate protection
Cresswell v Currie, consent by God to protect property is too remote
Baker v Wilkins, not available to protect people, only property
S1(2) Aggravated Criminal Damage
AR
Basic Criminal Damage AR
That endangers life
Warwick, danger must come from destruction of property
Steer, damage to door and window but bullets did not endanger life
MR
Intent/reckless to destroying/damaging property
Intent/reckless to whether life was at danger by destruction/damage of property
Sangha, still guilty if D intended/realised damage would endanger life
S1(3) Arson + S1(4) Aggravated Arson
AR
Destroys/damages
S10(1) Property
That endangers life (only aggravated arson)
By fire
MR: Intention/Recklessly
Mostrar resumen completo
Ocultar resumen completo
¿Quieres crear tus propios
Mapas Mentales
gratis
con GoConqr?
Más información
.
Similar
Police Powers: Powers of Arrest
nings.doyle9418
Express and Implied Terms
Craig Tyler
Self Defence: S3 Criminal Law Act 1967
beccehjane
Criminal Law
jesusreyes88
Weimar Revision
Tom Mitchell
Biology Revision - Y10 Mock
Tom Mitchell
Hitler and the Nazi Party (1919-23)
Adam Collinge
History of Medicine: Ancient Ideas
James McConnell
Geography Coastal Zones Flashcards
Zakiya Tabassum
Biology- Genes and Variation
Laura Perry
FREQUENCY TABLES: MODE, MEDIAN AND MEAN
Elliot O'Leary
Explorar la Librería