303241
Descripción
Mapa Mental por Marcus Danvers, actualizado hace más de 1 año
|
Creado por Marcus Danvers
hace alrededor de 11 años
|
|
(6)Lowering the voting age
- Responsibilities without rights
- Lowering the Voting age is that it will
create stronger political engagement.
- Currently 18-24 year old's
have the lowest turn out.
- By lowering the voting it would reengage votes in the following
ways, it would strength understanding and interested, it would
reorientate politics around issues concerning younger voters.
- Lowering the Voting age is that it will
create stronger political engagement.
- Youth interests ignored
- Youth interests are currently ignore
under the system of voting at 18.
- Due to the lack of political representation of 16
to 18 year old their views, needs and interested
are routinely marginalized or ignored.
- Lowering the voting age will give fresh thinking
on education, drugs policy, and social morality.
- Youth interests are currently ignore
under the system of voting at 18.
- Stronger political engament
- concern about declineing civil engagement
focuses particularly on the young, as 18-24
years old's have the lowest turnout rates
- lowering the voting age would
re-engage such voters in two
ways.
- First, it would strengthen their
interest and understanding
- Second, it would help to
re-orientate politics around
issues more meaningful to
younger voters
- First, it would strengthen their
interest and understanding
- concern about declineing civil engagement
focuses particularly on the young, as 18-24
years old's have the lowest turnout rates
- Irrational cut-off age
- The notion that the current voting age
is a refection of intellectual and
educational development is flawed.
- It both ignores the steady rise in
educational standards and the fact that no
restrictions are applied to ignorant and
poorly educated adults
- If 16- or 17- years old's are being excluded from politics on
the grounds of their knowledge and level of understanding,
the principle is being very inconsistently applied
- The notion that the current voting age
is a refection of intellectual and
educational development is flawed.
- Immature voters
- 16 years old's are
immature voters.
- Young people at 16 are usual
in full time education and
continue to live with their
parents.
- This means that they are not full citizens, and
there educational development remains
incomplete due to there immaturity.
- Most 16-18 year olds are
unlikely to be interested in or
understand politics.
- 16 years old's are
immature voters.
- Preserving childhood
- The campaign to lower the voting age is a
symptom of a larger trends to erode
childhood by forcing adult responsibilities
and choices on children and young people
- Adolescence should be a period during which young people can
concentrate on school, enjoyment and personal development,
without having weighty political matters placed on their shoulder
- The campaign to lower the voting age is a
symptom of a larger trends to erode
childhood by forcing adult responsibilities
and choices on children and young people
- Deferred representation
- To regard the lack of representation of 16-18
years old's as a political injustice is absurd
- Unlike women and the working classes of old,
young people are not permanently denied political
representation
- Their representation is only delayed or deferred. moreover, 18 year old's are
also likely to be broadly in touch with the interests of 16 and 17 year old's
- To regard the lack of representation of 16-18
years old's as a political injustice is absurd
- Undermining turnout
- lowering the voting age
would undermined turnout.
- This is the idea that by lowering the
voting age the turnout rates may decline
- The young person vote (16-24) may increases due
to increased size of the group but the overall turnout
may decline. Due to the fact that young voter are less
likely to vote than older voters.
- lowering the voting age
would undermined turnout.
¿Quieres crear tus propios Mapas Mentales gratis con GoConqr? Más información.