Before Const. was
Articles of
Confederation. AoC
had a very weak
central government.
No way to levy taxes
or declare war.
Shay's Rebellion
(1786) proved that.
Compromises: -CT:
two house congress.
-General Power:
Congress has limited,
specific powers.
Necessary and Proper Clause: Congress can
make laws NP for carrying into execution
delegated powers (declare war, raise army,
lay taxes, ratify treaties, borrow $, regulate
commerce among states, coin $, establish
post office, and issue patents.
The Continental Congress
feared a monarchy, so they
set up a system of checks
and balances among the
different branches. In
addition, lots of
compromises and issues
are present in the
document because of
political games; to get it
ratified the CC had to
make sacrifices.
Problems: power of SC
poorly defined, electoral
college, slavery/women's
rights, no Bill of Rights
American
Political Culture
US is more
diverse today,
but it was
always "from
many, 1 union"
1880s: 2nd wave of
immigration (southern
+ eastern Europe),
1882: Chinese
Exclusion Act, 1917:
National literacy test to
become citizen. today:
more illegal
immigration, more
border crossing since
1970
less benefits to Imm.
now, less unskilled
labor. in the past there
was lots of jobs
available. , costs for
gov't higher
we favor family preferences
over skills, but trending
towards Canada's
prioritizaiton of valuable
skills
americans believe in ability
to get ahead, distrust big
gov't, emphasizes
individuals (no support for
gov't reducing income
inequality), these views are
shared across
demographics
we have a liberal cultures because we
have always been wealthy, and no
feudalism, also immigration enforces
these values.
liberalism: maximizing
rights by minimizing
governmental
influence/interference.
Liberalism: modern left (big
fiscal gov't, small social
gov't)
liberalism: liberty
through freedom,
republicanism: liberty
through collectivism
Judicial Review
the power of
the courts to
declare laws
unconstitutional
Marbury v. Madison: (1803)
Marbury is appointed by not
sworn in, sues, Marshall
names law unconstituional.
Establishes Judicial review
through the supremacy
clause. New laws supersede
old laws are superseded by
the constitution.
-deference to
congress,
-original intent,
-experiential,
-plain meaning
of the text
doubts: Dred Scott (1857), this
decision led to the civil war
because the SC agreed with the
slaveholder. (named MO
compromise unconstitutional)
SC is supposed to be
impartial, but in
practice appointments
are often highly
politicized.
Federalism
divides
governmental
authority
between two
levels, and
each can act
independently.
most have a
unitary gov't
Thomas Hobbes
said "if you divide
sovreignty into
parts, those parts
will go to war
in const: Necessary and Proper
clause and tenth amendment
(powers not delegated to Fed.
and not prohibited to the states
belongs to the states)
dual
sovreignty:
each level of
gov't is
sovreign in its
own space,
each has
independent
rights, and
the courts
decide
jurisdicition
McCulloch v. MD (1819):
expansive definition of NP
clause (convenience) and
also establishes that
federal government
supersedes state
governments.
1990s radioactive case upheld dual
sovreignty. fed cant order states to do
something directly (they can give
categorical grants though, South Dakota v.
Dole) this case was a limit on NP clause
Prince v. US: fed law requiring background
checks for firearms. declared unconst. because
outside of federal jurisdiction
commerce clause: regulate commerce
among states. originally limited fed powers
through US. v. Knight, then expanded in
FDR's era with the New deal, -allowed for
civil rights act to be passed - then recently
(1990's) become more strict again (US. v.
Lopez).
Shecter v. Poultry (1935):
before FDR, establishes clear
boundaries on federal
government power through the
commerce clause. one of last
times before switch in time
saved nine
spending clause: congress can
spend for general welfare. in
Helvering v. Davis (social
security) it was decided that
the discretion is up to congress,
unless that choice is obviously
wrong_
categorical grants
give money to states
with a plan in action.
pork barrel is when
you do something in
exchange for money
(?)?
Sebelius: spending clause and
commerce clause. originally bill
states a fee. court says its a tax,
which is allowed (through
spending clause). but what was
not allowed was being "too
coercive' with fed. money to
states (if states don't raise $ for
medical fed. gov't will remove
funding). you can't use the
commerce clause to regulate
inactivity. can't use commerce
clause to charge a fee to indiv.
for not buying insurance)
New Deal: marked shift towards bigger fed. gov't. court
packing: FDR wanted to pack the courts to get what he
wanted but there was public outrage. then two judges
switched their viewpoints and they got what he wanted
shifted with NLRB v. Jones: unionizing is a federal issue
The Modern
Courts
SC Primary
objectives: Unify
US legal system,
keep law stable
over time. (stare
decisis)
stare decisis: stable
decision, courts rule
one way and keep that
ruling throughout time
to maintain the SC as
an institution, maintain
legitimacy
judicial activism (overturn
stare decisis to keep
constitution relevant) vs.
Judicial restraint (rule narrowly
and avoid an overturning)
US has a common law not civil
law. meaning our system of
meaning is based on cases not
statutes, and courts look to past
cases and stare decisis to make a
current ruling
Bush v. Gore 2000:
establishes legitamacy of the
courts because they ordered
to stop counting and they
did. also illustrates diff b/wn
state and fed courts: gore
went to state because they
were more liberal and he
thought they would go in his
favor
Public Opinion
public is inconsistent (wants
less $ overall, wants less $ spent
specifically. public is uninformed
(will make up a viewpoint even if
they don't have some. public is
non-ideological, and moderate.
latent public opinion:
how the public will react
to an event in the future.
to accurately poll, each
member of the population
must have an equal chance
of being part of a survey.
this is random selection and
avoids selection bias. never
trust call-in surveys because
only people with certain
viewpoints will respond to it
Federalist Papers
#10: there are lots of factions, so many that
no one can dominate. (factions are good if
you have a bunch)-- argument for big
government
#47: afraid of
big gov't. so lets
make factions
within the gov't
so that it can't
oppress us.
#48: why checks and balances are
good. checking the legislature is
important. protect government
from rash or quick action
#51: competitive not
only within
government but b/wn
fed. and state gov'ts.
extra C&B for
legislature
#39: reassure people
that this will work.
powers of fed. gov't are
"few and defined".
(maybe not true
empirically)
#78: judiciary is weakest branch
because it controls "neither the
sword or the purse". power of
judicial review, fed. courts have a
duty to interpret the const.
#70: an energetic executive
is key for the rapid and swift
movement of the republic
and ultimately ensures a
safer republic. in addition,
one executive rather than
many is good because one
can act more swiftly than
many