Constitutional - Entitled to Full
Faith and Credit
Types
Jurisdiction Over Defendant
In Personam
General
D can be sued in forum for
claim that arose
ANYWHERE in the world
Specific
D is sued on claim
that arose IN FORUM
Doctrine of Relatedness
Jurisdiction Over D's Property
In Rem
Lawsuit is over who owns the property
Quasi In Rem
Dispute has nothing to do with
ownership, D clearly owns it, dispute is
over something else
Pennoyer's underlying case - Mitchell v. Neff
In Personam Jurisdiction
I. Constitutional Analysis
1. Does a traditional basis apply from Pennoyer?
Yes
Based on Burnham...
May its ok by itself
But still do Shoe
Maybe not ok by itself, might have to do Int'l Shoe
No
2. Then Do Shoe
A. is there a relevant contact between D and Forum?
No - NO PJ
Yes
B. Was there purposeful availment?
Yes
C. Fairness
Inconvenience for D and Witnesses
BK makes it almost impossible to show this
Relative wealth doesn't matter
Forum States Interest
McGee
State has interest in protecting citizens form
getting ripped off
P's interest
interest in convenience
Legal systems interest in efficiency
Shared Substantive policies
II. State Statute Analysis
Non-resident motorist act
Long Arm Statute
Allows you to sue a non-resident; lists things that
non-residents can do in state that would subject them to PJ
Typical example: Non-Resident commits a Tort
Person A produced widgets, widget directly sold to someone in
state B and it blows up in state B - did you commit a Tort in
state B - some say yes (injury was there) some say no (act
wasn't there)
Quasi In Rem/ In Rem
I. Constitutional Requirement
1. Property is attached at onset of suit
II State Statute
Attachment Statute
Says state has power over
property person owns in state
All states have them
2. International Shoe Minimum Contacts
Shaeffer v. Heitner
Held Constitution test for in rem/ QIR is the
same as In Personam (International Shoe)