A level (PM, Cabinet and the Executive) Governing the UK - 2C Mapa Mental sobre (5) What are the constraints
on a PM?, creado por Marcus Danvers el 23/01/2014.
The political "weight" of a
cabinet minister is
determined by free factor:
The seniority of
his or her office
His or her standing
within the party
His or her public profile
The influence of the cabinet is
most clearly reflected in the power
that can be wielded by leading
individual minister, the "big beasts"
Thatchers public image and
standing within the party were
damaged by resignation:
Michael Heseltine
(Defence Secretary) 1986
Nigel Lawson
(Chancellor) 1989
Geoffrey Howe
(Deputy Prime) 1990
She survived each of these resignation,
they provide context for her eventual
downfall in December 1990
Blair was alleged forced to give Brown the position
of Chancellor in 1997-2007 because Brown was not
going to stand for leadership in 1994 election
This deal was made because of
Browns high standing in the party
meaning he could have won
Party leadership
This Prime Minster party
support is conditional.
In partial parties look to PM to provide
leadership that will help to maintain party
unity and ensure the party electoral success.
The most dramatic example of this was the fall of Thatcher.
The key factor in the removal of Thatcher was her failure to
win sufficient supportfrom MP's in the leadership election
Backbencher support was lost
over europe and poll tax
John Major's premiership was blight by deepening
tensions with in the Conservative Party over Europe.
Having tried to place the UK "at the heart of Europe",
Blair's authority over the Labour
party declined significantly after
the Iraq war in 2003
This stimulated the largest
backbench rebellion against any
government for over 100 years
In Browns first month as PM, Brown suffered back 8
backbenchers rebellion, more than the total number of revolts
against all incoming PM in their first month since 1945
Electorate
The Prime minster relation ship with the
public is usually a major strength, but it
can also be a source of vulnerability.
In a sense, the state of public
opinion underpins all the other
constraints on the PM.
When government popular dips, and if the chances
of winning the next election are thrown into doubt, life
becomes much more difficult for the PM
For example Thatchers vulnerability in the late
1980's coincided with declining poll ratings and
early signs of improved support for Labour Party
Major's control of his party was damaged by a
succession of by-election defects and defeats in
local and European Parliament election.
Blair's authority over his party and
his government was weakened by
Labour's reduced majority in 2005
Blair in fact, persuaded him self
to pre-announce his resignation-
meaning he was a "lame duck"
Browns stature of PM was badly damaged in
October 2007 by confused messages over the likely
timing of the next GE the "election that never was"
Media
The PM realtion with the
press is in fact rarely direct.
Instead, his or her image is
presented to the through the
"prism " of the mass media.
While PM have tried to exploit their access to the media for personal
benefit, there are also indications that the media is becoming more
critical of politicians generally and more difficult to manage
Blair government and the BBC had battles over allegations that, in
the run-up to the Iraq War, the government had "sexed up" a
dossier emphasizing the military threat posed by Iraq to the UK.
The relationship between the PM
and the media nevertheless reached
a particular low under Brown
It was widely argued that brown lacked
the communication and presentational
skills to be successful modern leader
The media's coverage of politics had
become more difficult for the PM to
manage for the following reasons:
A tendency to "hype"
Increasingly intense commercial pressure
force the media to make their coverage of
politics "sexy" and attention grabbing
The blurring of facts
and interpretation
The coverage of news and current affairs had changed in
recent years. The media now blurres the difference between
the news and the comments, as an attempt to define "the story"
Television increasingly follows the
print media in its style of political
and current affairs coverage
This means not only that television stories are picked up
from newspaper headlines, but that this has also
affected the style of current affairs coverage on television.
Pressure of events
The PM has limited control over "what happens". In theory,
the PM "runs the country", but in practice suprises come
along that demonstrate how little control they actually have
Thatcher "initiated" the Falklands War of
1982, and considerably benefited from the
victory; but, had the outcome been different,
her premiership may have been destroyed
John Major was less fortunate over "Black
Wednesday", 16 September 1992, when intensifying
currency speculation finally forced the UK to leave the
Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM).
Blair's public reputation was badly damaged by
the suicide of David Kelly, a biological war expert
who contributed to the development of the
government Iraq military war dossier in 2003
His dealh substantially intensified media and
political speculation about the basis on which
the decision to go to war was made
In the case of Brown, his reputation for effective leadership
and economic competence was destroyed by the recession
that started in 2008, despite his robust response to the
Global financial crisis that had precipitated it.
In many ways, the problem of "events" is a
structural one not merely a question of random
surprises. This occurs in three main ways:
Prime minister only
control top-level decisions
The implementaion of decisions is in
the hands of bodies and actors over
whom PM's have very little direct control
For example, the effectiveness of welfare reforms
is affected by decitions taken by people such as
hospital mangers, doctors, head teachers
The growth of presidentialism
has over-stretched the PM's
breadth of interests
PM's are now expected to speak out on all important question
domestic and international, and they are held responsible for
blunders and mistakes whenever they may occur
Prime ministerial
power may be
counter-productive
The ability of PM's to react appropriately to political events may
be impaired by their increasing reliance on close confidants and
hand-picked advisors - not exposed to a wide range of views
Example of PM's losing their political "touch": are
Thatcher introduced the poll tax and Blair's
stubborn determination to support the USA in Iraq