Topic 1 - Trend in the Ownership and control of the Mass Media
Descripción
A level (The Mass Media) Sociology Mapa Mental sobre Topic 1 - Trend in the Ownership and control of the Mass Media, creado por Victor Mendon el 29/04/2014.
Topic 1 - Trend in the Ownership and control of the Mass
Media
The mass media are agencies of
communication that transmit information,
education, news and entertainment to
mass audiences
The print media
The audio visual
media
Cybermedia
Growth of tv channels, internet, said
that 7 coroporations owned all media
output in USA
Horizontal integration - refers to fact that
bigger media companies often own a diverse
range of media
Vertical integration - owning all the stages in production,
distribution and consumption of a product, this gives
media companies greater economic control
Diversification - the practise of spreading risk by
moving into new, unrelated areas of the business
e.g. Virgin is a diversified company, it has major
interests in music, cinemas, tv, internet and in
addition also sells insurances and banking
services as well as train and airline services
Global conglomeration - trend for media corporations
to have presences in many countries and operate in
the global market
Pluralist Theory of Media Ownership
From a pluralist view point, modern
capitalist societies are democratic; all
interest groups are given a platform to
express their views
Mass media is seen to be essential component of this
democratic ideal because most people obtain their
knowledge about politics from newspapers and tv
Power then according to pluralist thinkers
lies within the consumer or the audience
rather than the owners, the media therefore
gives public what audiences want rather
than what owner decides
Pluralists argue that concentration
of media ownership is aimed at
maximising audience sizes in order
to reduce costs and attract
advertising revenue
The globalization of media and conglomerates that have
resulted are just attempts of finding new audiences and
increasing audience sizes in order to increase profits
Vertical integration, horizontal
integration and diversification have
reduced costs as media companies
no longer use external media
companies who may be competing
with them
One writer argued that media owners have
global problems of trade and investment to
occupy their minds, so do not have time to
think about day to day details of running
media businesses
Pluralists argue that the
range of media products
available to audiences is
extremely diverse,
meaning all points of view
in a democratic society
are catered for
E.g. if majority of newspapers raise concerns
of young people carrying knives, they are
mirroring concerns of majority of citezens
Pluralists point to public
service broadcasting which
are media outlets controlled
by the state and have
responsibility of providing
impartiality
Best example is the BBC which has
a legal obligation to inform, educate
and entertain full audience
spectrums
Pluralists see the public service
broadcasting as the epitome of
impartial and objective media
and counter weigh any potential
bias in the private sector
Pluralists also argue that power of media owners is
restricted by state controls e.g. some societies do not
allow owners to own too much media or different
types of media in order to reduce possibility of ones
persons views or groups views becoming dominant
Another form of state control on media ownership
is fact that BBC and other channels have powerful
regulator e.g. Ofcom whose function is to monitor
content and quality on television
This stops media owners imposing biased
content upon general public
Pluralists also argue that audiences do not
passively accept what is fed to them by the
media, audiences are selective and often critical
of media content
They say audiences are very diverse
and interpret and use the media in
different ways
Marxist Critique of Media Ownership
Marxists argue that the economic system
of the UK i.e. capitalism is deeply unfair
because if generally benefits minority
(ruling class)
Marxists argue that inequalities in wealth and
income and therefore poverty are a direct result of
the way capitalism is organised
Capitalist class exploit labour power
of working class, this inequalitity is
passed through each generation
False class
consciousness - thinking
capitalism is a fair system
which benefits us all
The capitalist society
uses cultural power to
transmit ruling class
ideology (hegemony)
but persuading the
majority that capitalist
society is meritocratic
They are able to do this as they own
social institutions that diffuse values
and interests into society (mass
media, religion and education)
Ruling class divert
attention away from
exploitation
Marxists see the main function of the
media is to convince the general public
that ruling class ideology is the 'truth'
and 'fact'
Role of the media is to
shape how we think about
the world we live in
Blinds working class
We are never encouraged to be
critical of the capitalist system
It have been suggested
that governments are no
longer interested in
controlling the activites
of media owners
Evidence supporting Marxist
Critique
In Italy is has been demonstrated that Silvio Berlusconi control of
3 television stations which reached 40% of Italian audience was
instrumental in his party winning the general election and resulting
in him becoming prime minister
The Glasgow University Media Group
(GUMG)
The GUMG take a hegemonic approach to media
ownership and control
The way in which the ruling class project their views on the world so it
becomes consensus view
The GUMG suggest that media content does support the interests of those
who run the capitalist system but this is an accidental by product of the
social background of journalists and broadcasters
These tend to be overwhelmingly white, male and middle class
GUMG argues that journalists desires not
to 'rock the boat' is mainly motivated by
profit, media is generally a profit making
business
It makes these profits by attracting
advertising revenue
If viewers or readers are put off by the content
provided because it is interpreted as offensive or
upsetting then profits are likely to decline
This is generally why newspapers
and tv production usually play safe by
excluding anything that may be seen
as offensive or upsetting
Agenda setting - controlling the issues that
come to the public eye
The GUMG notes that the media decide what
issues should be discussed by society and
which ones should be avoided, but it is said
that the media usually present us with a narrow
agenda for discussion
E.g. we often talk about the size and
shape of celebrities bottoms but often
do not discuss the massive
inequalities that exist in society
GUMG argue that we do not get presented with
really important information that would help
ordinary members of society make real choices
about how society should be run
Agenda setting therefore results in 'cultural
hegemony' with the basic principles of capitalism
being presented and 'normal' and 'natural'
Fallacy of Choice
Commentators have suggest that the BBC is
increasingly abandoning its public service
broadcasting aims because it is losing its
audiences to commercial and satellite television
As a result of this the BBC has
become more comerciallized and
populist in an attempt to keep
audiences
In order to compete they
have had to set yo BBC
digital channels and also
internet news in response to
competition
Which pluralists claim can only be
good for audiences
Largest possible audiences are needed
to attract advertising revenue and BBC
need to justify licencing fee
And in order to attract largest audiences are
achieved by targeting lowest common
denominator, content primarily based on
entertainment as its least likely to bore viewers
On tv now we get a lot more cheap
american important and we are also
likely to experience more repeats
Time allocated to new programming has
fallen dramatically and more time has
been allocated to celebrity news
To conclude despite
hundreds of TV
channels we not have
more choice but more of
the same
So this dramatic expansion in
number of television channels
may have led to less overall
choice