80967
Argument from Religious Experience
- Inductive Argument
- If something is experienced, it must exist
- People experience God
- God must exist
- This is not necessarily true - Subjective
(the experience can't be verified)
- Contingent truth - If the claims of people having religious
experiences are not correct, then the conclusion is not true
- Contingent truth - If the claims of people having religious
experiences are not correct, then the conclusion is not true
- Direct Awareness - You have experienced
it therefore you know it to be true
- Mental Illnesses
- Intoxication
- Senses decieved
- God must exist
- An Empiricist view
- Based on sense experience
- Based on sense experience
- People experience God
- As it is an inductive argument, it can never
be considered as proof but can be persuasive
- If something is experienced, it must exist
- Swinburne's Theory of Testimony and Credulity
- Testimony
- The account of the experience
- Believe the person unless there is a reason not to
- E.g - lying would be beneficial to them, they are a
known liar, they are mentally ill or they are intoxicated
- E.g - lying would be beneficial to them, they are a
known liar, they are mentally ill or they are intoxicated
- Believe the person unless there is a reason not to
- Can be very certain with a group experience
- The account of the experience
- Credulity
- Credibility
- The experience itself
- If 'x' seems present, 'x' is probably present
- Unless there is reason
not to believe them, again
- Unless there is reason
not to believe them, again
- If 'x' seems present, 'x' is probably present
- Credibility
- Testimony
- The Cumulative Argument
- The idea that if you put all of the arguments for the existence
of God together, it creates an argument that is total proof that God exists
- Teleological/Design Argument
- Cosmological Argument
- Ontological Argument (Existence)
- Moral Argument
- Religious Experience
- = Sound Argument
- = Sound Argument
- Religious Experience
- Moral Argument
- Ontological Argument (Existence)
- Cosmological Argument
- The counter for this argument is the Leaky Bucket argument
- The idea that all of these arguments on their own are full of
holes, putting them together doesn't fix the holes, it creates more
- The idea that all of these arguments on their own are full of
holes, putting them together doesn't fix the holes, it creates more
- The idea that if you put all of the arguments for the existence
of God together, it creates an argument that is total proof that God exists
¿Quieres crear tus propios Mapas Mentales gratis con GoConqr? Más información.