Adult Relations: Legal Effects of Marriage (Scotland)
Descripción
(Comparative Scottish and English Family Law) Law Mapa Mental sobre Adult Relations: Legal Effects of Marriage (Scotland), creado por Ruaraidh Simpson el 19/04/2017.
Adult Relations: Legal Effects
of Marriage (Scotland)
Obligation to support spouse/civil partner financially: Aliment
Who owes a duty?
husband to wife
wife to husband (see s.4 Marriage
and CP Act 2014 for interpretation)
a partner in CP to other partner
Family Law (Scotland) Act
1985 s.1(1)(c)&(d)
concerning children
Amount?
Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985
s.1(2) - the obligation of aliment is
an obligation to provide such
support as is reasonable in the
circumstance, having regard to s.4
Reasonable amount?
Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985 s.4
s.4(3) the court
(a) may, if it thinks
fit, take account of
any support ...
given by the
defender to any
person whom he
maintains as a
dependant in his
household
(b) shall not
take account
of any
conduct of a
party unless
manifestly
inequitable
to leave it
out of
account
see s.27 for
interpretation
s.4(1) the court shall, subject
to ss.(3) have regard to
(a) the needs and
resources of the parties
(b) the earning capacities
of the parties
(c) generally to all the
circumstances of the case
Actions and Defences
Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985
s.2(1) A claim ... may be made, against any
person owing an obligation of aliment, in the
Court of Session or the Sheriff Court
(6) It shall be competent to bring an action
notwithstanding that the [pursuer] is living
in the same household as the defender
(8) It shall be a defence to an action [except for
the pursuer <16] that the defender is making an
offer, which it is reasonable to ... accept, to
receive that person into his household and to
fulfil the obligation of aliment
Orders for Aliment
Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985
s.3(1) Court may, if it thinks fit, grant
decree in an action for aliment and
has power to
(a) order making of periodical payments,
whether for a definite or indefinite period
or until happening of a specified event
(b) order alimentary payments of
occasional or special nature
s.3(2) no lump sum available
Moveable Property
Harper v Adair 1945 JC 21
implied
ownership from
possession of
property?
presumed
ownership lost
at end of
relationship as
with
possession?
No
presumption
to
arise
in
terms
of
marriage
Family Law (Scotland Act 1985
s.24 - subject to the provisions of
any enactment (including this Act),
marriage or civil partnership shall
not of itself affect
(a) the rights of the parties to marriage or
partners in civil partnership in relation to
their property
(b) the legal capacity of those
parties or partners
Gifts
to one or both of the parties -
general rule of property law applies
McDonald v McDonald 1953 SLT (Sh Ct) 36
A husband separated from his wife raised an action
against her for delivery of certain items. The items
had been bought with £20 given as a wedding
present to both husband and wife by his mother
held that the items were the joint property of
the parties (gift had been given to both parties)
Between the parties - general
rule of property law applies
Jamieson v McLeod (1880) 7 R 1131
presumption against donation in property law
generally easy to rebut presumption in terms of marriage
concerning gifts between spouses
Other Moveables
s.25 Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985 -
household goods (presumption of
right to equal shares)
s.26 Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985 -
housekeeping allowance
(presumption of right to equal
shares)
Bank Accounts
Smith v Smith 1933 SC 701
partners not restricted in the type of evidence they may bring to
substantiate a claim on the exclusion of money and securities
from presumption of equal shares in household goods
Husband owner of savings made by
wife from money received as
housekeeping allowance as donation
cannot be inferred due to the fact
that the money has been expected to
be used to run the home
Preston v Preston 1950 SC 253
held that savings from a
wife's housekeeping
allowance belonged to
the husband because
the wife was simply
acting as his agent
Pyatt v Pyatt SLT (Notes) 73
housekeeping allowance
Husband claimed payment from
wife of the sum of £7K being one
half of a prize of £14K which the
defender won in November 1964
from a football results forecast
Pursuer argued this had been a joint venture,
and provided a contrary argument that the
£14K total was money derived from the
housekeeping allowance and was therefore
entitled to an equal share
no contract between
spouses as to the
allocation of winnings?
no averments of a verbal
agreement, but not safe to dismiss
pursuers case as irrelevant
money was neither "money
derived from any allowance" nor
"property acquired out of such
money" as per s.1 of the Married
Women's Property Act 1964
Occupancy Rights
Terminology
s.1 Matrimonial Homes (Family Protection) (Scotland) Act 1981
ss.(1) where, apart from the provisions of this Act, one
spouse is entitled, or permitted by a third party, to occupy
a matrimonial home (an "entitled spouse") and the other
spouse is not so entitled or permitted (a "non-entitled
spouse"), the non-entitled spouse shall, subject to the
provisions of this Act, have the following rights
(a) if in occupation, a right to continue to
occupy the matrimonial home
(b) if not in occupation, a right to enter
into and occupy the matrimonial home
(1A) ... without prejudice to their
generality, the right to do so together
with any child of the family
Occupancy rights in what?
s.22 Matrimonial Homes (Family
Protection) (Scotland) Act 1981
In this Act "matrimonial home"
means any house, caravan,
houseboat, or other structure
which has been provided or has
been made available by one or
both of the spouses as, or has
become, a family residence
but does not include a residence provided or made
available by a person for one spouse to reside in,
whether with any child of the family or not,
separately from the other spouse
Application for Occupancy Rights
s.3 Matrimonial Homes (Family
Protection) (Scotland) Act 1981
ss.(1) a court can (a) declare (b)
enforce (c) restrict (d) regulate
and/or (e) protect occupancy rights
ss.(3) court shall grant an application under (a) if it
appears that the application relates to a family
home; and if (b) to (e) may make such order as
appears to it to be just and reasonable having
regard to all the circumstances of the case including
(a) conduct of the partners to each other or otherwise
(b) respective needs and financial resources of partners
(c) needs of any child of the family
(d) extent to which family home ... is used in
connection with trade, business or profession
(e) whether entitled partner offers to make available to
non-entitled partner suitable alternative accomodation
Subsidiary and Consequential Rights
s.2 Matrimonial Homes (Family
Protection) (Scotland) Act 1981
Making payments owed
by entitled spouse e.g.
rent, mortgage etc.
Carry out essential and non-essential repairs
Have court apportion expenditure
Exclusion Orders
s.4 Matrimonial Homes (Family
Protection) (Scotland) Act 1981
ss.(2) subject to ss.(3) the court shall make an exclusion
order if it appears ... that the making of the order is
necessary for the protection of the applicant or any child
of the family from any conduct or threatened or
reasonably apprehended conduct of the non-applicant
spouse which is or would be injurious to the physical or
mental health of the applicant or child
ss.(3) the court shall not make an exclusion order
if it appears to the court that the making of the
order would be unjustified or unreasonable
(a) having
regard to all
the
circumstances
of the case
(b) where the
matrimonial home (i)
is or is part of an
agricultural holding
(ii) is let ... by an
employer as an
incident of
employment
Courts Reluctancy at First?
purpose of 1981 Act to protect people in difficult family
circumstances BUT made a fundamental change tp
property law in that the owner of property could be
excluded from (usually) his home in favour of a non-owner
Bell v Bell 1983 SC 182
Smith v Smith 1983 SLT 275
In both cases it was indicated that an exclusion order
should not be made if a matrimonial interdict
prohibiting the molestation of the applicant would be
a sufficient enough protection
Lord Dunpark in McCafferty
"in my opinion the words of
s.4(2) are clear and do not
require interpretation or
gloss"
The court must consider at least four questions:
1. What is the nature and quality of the alleged conduct?
2. Is the court satisfied that the conduct is
likely to be repeated if cohabitation continues?
3. Has conduct been or, if repeated, would it
be injurious to physical or mental health of the
applicant spouse or any child of the family?
4. If so, is the order sought necessary for the
future protection of physical or mental health
of the applicant or child?
Duration of ss.(3) and ss.(4) orders
s.5(1) the court may, on application of
either spouse, vary or recall any oder
made by it under s.3 or s.4 of this Act, but
... any such order shall, unless previously
so varied or recalled, cease to have effect
(a) on the termination of the marriage
(b) subject to ss.6(1) of this Act,
where there is an entitled and
non-entitled spouse, on the
entitled spouse ceasing to be an
entitled spouse in respect of the
matrimonial home to which the
order relates
(c) where both spouses are entitled,
or permitted by a third party, to
occupy the matrimonial home, on
both spouses ceasing to be so
entitled or permitted
Powers of Arrest
s.1 Protection from Abuse (Scotland) Act 2001
power of arrest must be attached to an
exclusion order if an applicant asks
for any other interdict the power of arrest may be attached if the court is
satisfied this is necessary to protect the applicant from the risk of abuse
s.14 Matrimonial
Homes (Family
Protection)
(Scotland) Act 1981
WARNING
interdict may be sought
despite living together as
husband and wife or as
civil partners
BUT s.14 cannot be used
on its own
"no s.14 interdict"
Tattersall v Tattersall
Other Points
Matrimonial Homes (Family Protection) (Scotland) Act 1981