null
US
Iniciar Sesión
Regístrate Gratis
Registro
Hemos detectado que no tienes habilitado Javascript en tu navegador. La naturaleza dinámica de nuestro sitio requiere que Javascript esté habilitado para un funcionamiento adecuado. Por favor lee nuestros
términos y condiciones
para más información.
Siguiente
Copiar y Editar
¡Debes iniciar sesión para completar esta acción!
Regístrate gratis
8820528
Assault
Descripción
Summary of the law of Assault
Sin etiquetas
a level
a2
law
non fatal offences
uk law
english law
revision
assault
unit 3
law
non fatal offences
a - level
Mapa Mental por
Yasmine King
, actualizado hace más de 1 año
Más
Menos
Creado por
Yasmine King
hace alrededor de 7 años
34
0
0
Resumen del Recurso
Assault
actus reus- causing a victim to apprehend immediate unlawful force
apprehend
to expect or to anticipate
DPP v Logdon
v went to D's home to collect unpaid taxes. D opened a draw amd revealed a gun that was fake. V thought it was real
A victim can still apprehend unlawful force, even if it was impossible for that force to be carried out
immediate
straight away or in the near future
Smith v Chief Constable of Woking
D went to v's home late at night stood outside her bedroom window and stared in a while she was getting ready for bed
immediate does not necessarily mean straight away it has broader meaning of 'in the near future'
things done
Read v Coker
D's went to v's premise to collect a debt. They surrounded v. They rolled up their selves and made fists v assumed D's would attack him
Gestures/ actions can be an assault
things said or written
R v Ireland
D was guilty of assault after making lots of unwanted telephone calls when they were answered there was silence
Even silence can be assault, spoken words can be assault
R v Constanza
D sent over 800 letters to the victim. Some had threats within them
Written words can be assault
Tuberville v Savage
Words can negate what would otherwise have been an assault
D placed hand on his sword and said "If it were not assize time, I would run you through the middle". D's conduct did not amount to assault
mens rea, either intention or recklessness as to cause v to apprehend immediate unlawful force
R v Mohan
Intention is where a defendant decides to bring about a prohibited consequence
R v Cunningham
Is where D realises there is a risk but carries on regardless
Mostrar resumen completo
Ocultar resumen completo
¿Quieres crear tus propios
Mapas Mentales
gratis
con GoConqr?
Más información
.
Similar
A2 Law: Special Study - Robbery
Jessica 'JessieB
LA4 Protection of Civil Rights and Liberties; A Bill of Rights?
shann.w
The Weimar Republic, 1919-1929
shann.w
Globalisation Case Studies
annie
Random German A-level Vocab
Libby Shaw
Sociology: Crime and Deviance Flash cards
Beth Morley
How Parliament Makes Laws
harryloftus505
Functionalist Theory of Crime
A M
A-Level Law: Theft
amyclare96
Realist Theories
A M
Ecosystems
Jessica Phillips
Explorar la Librería