Bixler obtained an option on a building he believed was suitable for use by a corporation he and two other individuals were organizing. After the corporation was successfully promoted, Bixler met with the board of directors, who agreed to acquire the property for $200,000. Bixler deeded the building to the corpor¬ation and the corporation began business in it. Bixler’s option contract called for the payment of only $155,000 for the building and he purchased it for that price. When the directors later learned that Bixler paid only $155,000, they demanded the return of Bixler’s $45,000 profit. Bixler refused, claiming the building was worth far more than $200,000 both when he secured the option and when he deeded it to the corporation. Which of the following statements correctly applies to Bixler’s conduct?
Selecciona una de las siguientes respuestas posibles:
-
A. It was improper for Bixler to contract for the option without first having secured the assent of the board of directors.
-
B. If, as Bixler claimed, the building was fairly worth more than $200,000, Bixler is entitled to retain the entire price.
-
C. Even if, as Bixler claimed, the building was fairly worth more than $200,000, Bixler nevertheless must return the $45,000 to the corporation.
-
D. In order for Bixler to be obligated to return any amount to the corporation, the board of directors must establish that the building was worth less than $200,000.