1891042
Description
Flashcards by Tells Bell, updated more than 1 year ago
|
Created by Tells Bell
almost 10 years ago
|
|
| Question | Answer |
| Ormsby v CCSP - scots law | courts were wary due to the possibility of falsified illness/evidence |
| Page v Smith | accident caused recurrence of CFS - claim if physical damage foreseeable |
| Dulieu v White | early instance - feared for own life - horse and cart and pub and kid |
| Chadwick v British Railway Board | rescuers were originally given preferential treatment as primary victims - reasonable foreseeability of rescuers |
| McLoughlin v O'Brain | secondary victim criteria not met - not foreseeable or proximate |
| Alcock | criteria for secondary victims - close tie of love and affection - own eyes - event or immediate aftermath - single shocking event |
| McFarlane v EE Caledonia | just a bystander -no liability - reasonable fortitude not foreseeable |
| Vernon v Bosely | recognised psychiatric injury |
| Greatorex v Greatorex | no duty owed by primary victim to secondary victim |
| Hinz v Berry | not just grief |
| White | must be in zone of danger Hillsborough - not police |
| Sion | single traumatic event not long drawn out angst |
Want to create your own Flashcards for free with GoConqr? Learn more.