Created by Priya Kapoor
about 4 years ago
|
||
Question | Answer |
Social Cognition | The manner in which we interpret, analyse, remember, and use information about the social world |
Cognitive miser | A term used to describe people’s reluctance to do much extra thinking |
Goals of thinking | • The first and most obvious goal is that people want to find the right answer to some problem or question. • The second goal of thinking is to confirm the desired answer to a problem. • A third goal is to reach a pretty good answer or decision quickly. |
Schemas | Mental frameworks centering on a specific theme that help us to organize social information |
Schemas influence three basic processes | Attention (They affect what is noticed.) Encoding (They affect what is stored in memory.) Retrieval (They affect what is recovered from memory.) |
cognitive load | In cognitive psychology, cognitive load refers to the used amount of working memory resources. |
Cognitive Load Theory | because short-term memory is limited, learning experiences should be designed to reduce working memory ‘load’ in order to promote schema acquisition |
The use of schemas as a basic concept was first used by | a British psychologist named Frederic Bartlett |
Who popularised the concept of schemas? | Jean Piaget |
Object schemas | one type of schema that focuses on what an inanimate object is and how it works |
Person schemas | focused on specific individuals |
Social schemas | Social schemas include general knowledge about how people behave in certain social situations. |
Self-schemas | Self-schemas are focused on your knowledge about yourself. |
Event schemas (Scripts) | Event schemas are focused on patterns of behavior that should be followed for certain events. This acts much like a script informing you of what you should do, how you should act, and what you should say in a particular situation. |
Schemas influence what we pay attention to | People are more likely to pay attention to things that fit in with their current schemas. |
Schemas also impact how quickly people learn | People also learn information more readily when it fits in with the existing schemas. |
Schemas help simplify the world | Schemas can often make it easier for people to learn about the world around them. New information could be classified and categorized by comparing new experiences to existing schemas. |
Schemas allow us to think quickly | Even under conditions when things are rapidly changing our new information is coming in quickly, people do not usually have to spend a great deal of time interpreting it. Because of the existing schemas, people are able to assimilate this new information quickly and automatically. |
Schemas can also change how we interpret incoming information | When learning new information that does not fit with existing schemas, people sometimes distort or alter the new information to make it fit with what they already know. |
Schemas can also be remarkably difficult to change | People often cling to their existing schemas even in the face of contradictory information. |
Perseverance effect (Schema persistence) | Belief perseverance is maintaining a belief despite new information that firmly contradicts it. |
Priming | priming is a technique in which the introduction of one stimulus influences how people respond to a subsequent stimulus For example, exposing someone to the word "yellow" will evoke a faster response to the word "banana" than it would to unrelated words like "television." |
Self-fulfilling Prophecy | predictions that, in a sense, make themselves come true |
Pygmalion Effect | The Pygmalion effect, or Rosenthal effect, is a psychological phenomenon wherein high expectations lead to improved performance in a given area. |
information overload | Information overload is the difficulty in understanding an issue and effectively making decisions when one has too much information about that issue |
Heuristics | Simple rules for making complex decisions or drawing inferences in a rapid manner and seemingly effortless manner mental shortcuts that provide quick estimates about the likelihood of uncertain events |
Representativeness heuristic | A strategy for making judgments based on the extent to which current stimuli or events resemble other stimuli or categories |
prototype | Summary of the common attributes possessed by members of a category |
Example of representativeness heuristic | • When you are trying to decide if someone is trustworthy, you might compare aspects of the individual to other mental examples you hold. A sweet older woman might remind you of your grandmother, so you might immediately assume that she is kind, gentle and trustworthy. |
Availability heuristic | A strategy for making judgments on the basis of how easily specific kinds of information can be brought to mind. This heuristic is related to Priming. |
Example of availability heuristic | • After reading an article about lottery winners, you start to overestimate your own likelihood of winning the jackpot. You start spending more money than you should each week on lottery tickets. |
Anchoring and adjustment heuristic | the tendency to judge the frequency or likelihood of an event by using a starting point (called an anchor) and then making adjustments up or down |
Example of anchoring and adjustment heuristic | • Masako asked two friends to estimate the number of people living in Tokyo. The correct answer, according to the 2000 census, was just over 12 million. She asked the first friend whether it was more or less than 8 million. She asked the second friend whether it was more or less than 16 million. The first friend guessed 9 million people, whereas the second friend guessed 15 million people. |
Affect heuristic | The affect heuristic is a heuristic, a mental shortcut that allows people to make decisions and solve problems quickly and efficiently, in which current emotion—fear, pleasure, surprise, etc. —influences decisions. |
Example of affect heuristic | For example, research has shown that people are more likely to see decisions as having benefits and lower risks when they are in a positive mood. Negative emotions, on the other hand, lead people to focus on the potential downsides of a decision rather than the possible benefits. |
anchoring bias | Anchoring bias is a cognitive bias that causes us to rely too heavily on the first piece of information we are given about a topic. |
Negativity Bias | people show greater sensitivity to negative information than to positive information People are faster and more accurate at identifying threatening facial expressions than positive facial expressions |
Optimistic Bias | Optimism bias (or the optimistic bias) is a cognitive bias that causes someone to believe that they themselves are less likely to experience a negative event. |
Overconfidence Barrier | Overconfidence barrier : the barrier that results when people have too much confidence in the accuracy of their judgements; people's judgements are usually not as correct as they think they are. |
Planning Fallacy | tendency to make optimistic predictions about how long it will take to complete a task |
Counterfactual thinking | Counterfactual thinking is a concept in psychology that involves the human tendency to create possible alternatives to life events that have already occurred; something that is contrary to what actually happened. |
Thought suppression | Thought suppression is a type of motivated forgetting when an individual consciously attempts to stop thinking about a particular thought. |
rebound effect of thought suppression | researchers demonstrated that the suppression of a particular thought often resulted in the subsequent increased return of the unwanted thought, a phenomenon termed the 'rebound effect' |
Magical thinking | Magical thinking, or superstitious thinking, is the belief that unrelated events are causally connected despite the absence of any plausible causal link between them, particularly as a result of supernatural effects. For example: "I got up on the left side of the bed today; therefore it will rain." |
The Influence of Affect on Cognition | Moods affect how new stimuli are perceived. Happy moods can increase creativity. Happy moods can make people more susceptible to social influence. Information that evokes emotional reactions may be processed differently than other kinds of information. Bad moods lead to more systematic thinking, while good moods lead to more heuristic thinking. |
mood-dependent memory | mood-dependent memory occurs when one's current mood resembles their mood at the time of memory storage, which helps to recall the memory. Thus, the likelihood of remembering an event is higher when encoding and recall moods match up. |
Mood congruence effect | The mood congruency effect is a psychological phenomenon in which a person tends to remember information that is consistent with their particular mood. People also tend to recall memories that coincide with the mood they are experiencing at a certain time. In simpler terms, if you're in a happy mood, you are more likely to recall happy memories, whereas, if you're sad, you are more likely to remember sad and depressing events. |
Affect and Cognition |
Image:
Image (binary/octet-stream)
|
Two-factor theory of emotion | The two-factor theory of emotion states that emotion is based on two factors: physiological arousal and cognitive label. The theory was created by researchers Stanley Schachter and Jerome E. Singer. |
Automatic Processing | brain functions that do not require us to pay attention or deliberately attempt to control events |
Controlled processing | Controlled processing requires us to pay attention and deliberately put in effort. |
Satisficing | Satisficing is a decision-making strategy in which the first option that satisfies certain criteria is selected, even if other, better options may exist. |
What topic do people spend the greatest amount of time thinking about? | PEOPLE |
Primacy effect | In simplest terms, the primacy effect refers to the tendency to recall information presented at the start of a list better than information at the middle or end. |
recency effect | the recency effect refers to the tendency for people to more easily recall items that are presented last in a list. In the case of the recency effect, this is likely due to those items being the most recent and therefore still being held in your short-term memory. |
Framing effect | The framing effect is a cognitive bias where people decide on options based on whether the options are presented with positive or negative connotations; e.g. as a loss or as a gain. People tend to avoid risk when a positive frame is presented but seek risks when a negative frame is presented. |
Stroop effect | The finding that it takes longer to say the color of ink used to print a word if the word and ink color don’t match (e.g., the word RED is printed in blue ink) than if they do match (e.g., the word BLUE is printed in blue ink) is called the Stroop effect. |
four elements that distinguish automatic from controlled processes | intention, control, effort, and efficiency |
intention | It may just happen whether you intend it to or not. |
control | • Automatic thoughts are not subject to deliberate control, so it can be difficult or even impossible to avoid having certain thoughts that have been cued. |
effort | • Automatic thoughts do not involve effort, whereas controlled thoughts often involve mental exertion and can feel taxing and tiring. |
efficient | automatic thoughts are highly efficient, unlike controlled thoughts (which are often slow and cumbersome) |
Automatic thinking involves little effort because it relies on knowledge structures. | Knowledge structures are organized packets of information that are stored in memory. These knowledge structures form when a set of related concepts is frequently brought to mind, or activated. |
Schema and Heuristic are two different things | Schema and Heuristic are two different things- not really related to one another, so I'm not sure asking for the difference between the two makes sense. That said- A Schema is a cognitive framework for storing information and relating it together. Schemas form the basis for knowledge in the head. A Heuristic is a mechanism for solving problems. Therefore, a schema is more associated with what topics a person might make decisions upon, whereas a heuristic is more associated with how a person makes those decisions. Heuristic methods very well may depend upon existing schema; however, schema do not necessarily require the existence of a heuristic method. |
Want to create your own Flashcards for free with GoConqr? Learn more.