Created by Yasmine King
over 7 years ago
|
||
Question | Answer |
R v Chan Fook (case facts) | D subjected V to questioning and locked him in a room. V feared D's return and injured himself when he fell trying to escape |
R v Chan Fook (legal principle - 1 ) | Harm cannot be so trivial as to be wholly insignificant |
R v Chan Fook (legal principle - 2) | Psychiatric harm can be ABH |
DPP v Smith (case facts) | D cut off v's (his girlfriends) pony tail |
R v Smith (Legal principle) | Cutting off a person's hair without his/ her consent can amount to ABH |
T v DPP (case facts) | V was chased by D. V fell and was kicked in the head. V briefly blacked out |
T v DPP (Legal Principle) | Even a very short loss of consciousness can amount to ABH |
R v Savage (case facts) | D aimed to throw contents of glass over V but accidentally allowed the glass to slip causing injury to V |
R v Savage (legal principle) | D does not need to intend/ be reckless as to causing injury to v |
Want to create your own Flashcards for free with GoConqr? Learn more.