Studies the stages and sequences of language
acquisition, addressing how acquisition happens
Learning Process
Studies and organisation of language might differ in the heads
of monolingual versus multilingual speakers, addressing what is
added and changed in people’s brains when they learn another
language
Learner differences
Considers aptitude in learning how learning is Learner
linked to age and sex, and addresses why differences some
L2 learners are more successful than others. 3
Differences in Learners
Sex
Of particular potential relevance to SLA are findings
in relation to mental representations in the lexicon
versus the grammar: females seem to be better at
memorizing complex forms, while males appear to
be better at computing compositional rules (e.g.
Halpern 2000).
Aptitude
a) Phonemic coding females are social ability construct, based on b) Inductive language outcomes reflected
learning ability from cultural & psychological c) Grammatical constraints & sensitivity influences. d)
Associative memory
Motivation
Integrative motivation
Involves emotional or effective reasons for learning an L2 , such
an intention to participate or integrate in the L2 speech
community
Instrumental motivation
Involes a purely practical reason for learning, such as better
job opportunities or passing required courses in school
cognitive style
It refers to individuals’ preferred way of processing, i.e. perceiving,
conceptualising, organising, recalling information It also closely related to
personality factors & learning strategies
Personality
Learning strategies
One goal in SLA research is to identify which strategies are used by relatively
good language learners, with the hope that such strategies can be taught or
otherwise applied to enhance learning.
Age
younger
- Brain plasticity
Not analytical
-Fewer inhibitions
- Weaker group
identity
Broca's area is reponsable for
the ability to language, whereas
Wenicke's area is responsable
for processing audio
language is represented primarialy in the
left half of the brain within an area
around the Sylvian fissure.
Methods for gathering
data have included the
following:
Correlation of location of the brain damage
How independent are the
languages of multilingual speakers?
Multiple language systems in
the brain are separated or
fused?Ervin & Osgood (1954)
suggested a three way possibility
for how language relate in an
individual’s mind
Ursula speaks French &Coordinate German
fluently, but cannot switch readily between
thebilingualism two. She must speak all German or
all French with you, even if you know both
languages.
Coordinate
bilingualism
Shane speaks EnglishSubordinate
natively & German as an L2. each time he
learns s.t. newbilingualism in German, he
translates it into English to memorise the
literal translation
Subordinate
Bilinguarism
Maria speaks French &Compound English fluently, &
often speaks “Frenglish”, with herbilingualism other
bilingual friends. She produces & understands this
mixture of languages easily
Compound
BIlingualism
Presentation of stimuli from different languages to
the R vs. the L visual or auditory fields
How are multiple language structures organized in
relation to one another in the brain? Are both languages
stored in the same areas?
First Condition 1.An individual was hearing a text, in order to learn a new
language task. 2.Colours indicate that there were cells working more than
in their resting state, with a higher metabolism. 3.Yellow & red (higher cell
activity); blue & black show decreased activity or none at all.
Second Condition 1.The same individual has now learned
the language task & is spelling out 2.Now the activity is
concentrated in the area of the cortex which is responsible
for the motor control of voice
Mapping the brain structure during surgery using
electrical stimulation at precise points & recording
which areas are involved
Does the organization of the brain for L2 in relation to L1
differ with age of acquisition, how it is learned, or level of
proficiency?
The answer is probably “yes” to all three, with the
strongest body of evidence showing that age of
acquisition influences brain organisation for many
L2 learners.
Positron Emission Tomography (PET-scan) &
other non-invasive imaging techniques
Do two or more languages show the same sort of
loss or disruption after brain damage? When there is
differential impairment or recovery, which language
recovers first?
One early hypothesis was that in cases of brain damage (some patterns of loss &
recovery for both/all of most multilingual persons’ languages), the last-learned
language would be the 1st lost, the next-to-the-last learned the 2nd to be lost, and so
forth, with L1 the last to remain
Research on this questions also shows that not only can different languages be
affected differentially by brain damage, but different abilities in the same language
may be differentially impaired(i.e. syntax |vocabulary,production | comprehension,
oral | written)
learning process
It claims that learning language is essentially like learning other
domains of knowledge: that whether people are learning
mathematics, or learning to drive a car, or learning Japanese, they
are not engaging in any essentially different kind of mental activity
Stages of information Processing
central processing
Controlled automatic processing
restructuring
input
persepcion
Output
Production
Thee effects of
MUltilingualism
Cognitive & metalinguistic advantages appear
in bilingual situations that involve systematic
uses of the two languages
Bilingual children show consistent
advantages in both verbal & non-verbal
tasks
Bilingual children show advanced
metalinguistic abilities