" the avoidance or minimization of the creation of waste exports and emissions by reduction at source, by on site recycling and / or by reducing the total level of its harmfulness to the environment "
P2
"the minimization of waste exports and emissions to air, water and soil in a preventive way, that is, by tackling the causes of the impacts, not by displacing or mitigating the effects".
Carrying out a P2-project
1. Planning and organization
2. Assessment
3. Feasibility analysis
4. Implementation
Decision making
Planning and execution
Follow-up: what's next?
Technical, Economical, Evironmental feasability
Final report
Collecting Data
Selecting flows
Generating prevention options
Getting involvement
Establish goals
Hierarchy
Cooperation between companies to optimize off-site recycling
Eco-industrial parks
Estate of manufcaturing and service business located together. Member businesses seek enhanced economic, environmental and social performance. Working together leads to a collective benefit: 1 + 1 = 3
Environmental Management Systems
“That part of the overall management system which includes organisational structure, planning activities, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes, and resources for developing, implementing, achieving, reviewing and maintaining the environmental policy”
Direct activities in a:
Consistent way: efficiency
Complete way
continuous way: policy aiming a way of continuous improvement
Motives
Internal:Identify, control and reduce. Compliance, cost-saving, avoid environmental harm
Can be: environmental analyses, developing EMS elements, WEP,P2-projects
5. Evaluation and reporting
Key questions
Develop EMS Bottom-up or Top-down
Top-Down: top management determines EMS and directs implementation. Communication with employees will be one-way. The advantage is that development is initiated fast. Disadvantage is that usefull workfloor information is neglected and commitment/motivation from workers will drop
Bottom-up: implies a high participation of workers and are early stage included and informed. Advantage is increased motivation and big contributions. The disadvantage is that the EMS will proceed at a slow pace
Develop a specific EMS-system or integrate it with other management systems
Companies ofte nalready use Deming cycle, so the EMS can be easily integrated. But it will be difficult to integrate overlapping items
Indicators
Environmental Condition Indicators
Provide information about the condition of the environment: State in DPSIR
Environmental performance indicators
Management performance indicaters
Response in DPSIR
Operational performance indicators
• the design, operation, and maintenance of the organization’s physical facilities and equipment; • the materials, energy, products, services, wastes, and emissions related to the organization’s physical facilities and equipment; and • the supply of materials, energy and services to, and the delivery of products, services and wastes from the organization’s physical facilities and equipment. Pressure in DPSIR
How are WE doing?
EPI-development
1. Establish the objectives of the indicators: what are the aims that we want to develop indicators for?
2. Define the metrics of the inidcators
3. Formulate the assessment of the indicators: by which procedures can we establish the values of the indicators?
Organizations and organizational change
Main goals: continuity and growth
Five company strategies by Mintzberg: the 5 P's
Plan: intended course of action
Ploy: a really specific manoeuvre to ouwit competitor
Pattern: strategy shouldn't be plan. What was successful in the past can be succesful in the future
Position: how the organiation relates to its competitive environment and what it can do to make its product unique in the marketplace
Perspective: influence of organizational culture and collective thinking on the strategic decision making within the company
The Four-stage model
Usefulness
May help as a guideline for mapping the state of environmental management in a company
Whether the company characteristics levels are in balance. In this way the model can be helpful in choosing the right environmental strategy
It helps the upgrade of a company to a higher strategy by identifying bottle necks (=knelpunten)
Mintzberg's models
Technostructure (analysts) which co-ordinate tasks in the organization by standardization of work or output
Support staff (support outside the realm of core activities
Middle line (middle managers)
Operating Core (the work floor)
Strategic Apex (top management)
Co-ordination mechanisms
Organization types
Entrepeneurial
Direct supervision from CEO
Key part: strategic apex
Usually small; small organization; personal
Apex commitment is decisive: personal contact is important
Machine
coordination mechanism: standardization of work process
Key: technostructure
Large established organizations: standard products with standard routine administrative of technological production process
Company structure suitable for ISO-14001 EMSs
Professional
Prime coordiation mechanism: standardization of skills
Operating core is the key part
Medium to large organizations; providing complex services in a stable environment
Difficult for implementing EMS; commitment from operating core is important
Organizational Learning
Models of (individual) learning
Kolb Cycle
1. Concrete experience
2. Reflective observation
3. Abstract observation
4. Active Experimentation
Giving rise to a new idea
Romme & Dillen: Single/Double loop learning
Single loop: errors are corrected based on existing rules and norms
Double loop: changes in rules and norms based on cognitive processes
Learning processes in generating organizational learning
Individual learning
Process or system learning: information processing and problem solving capabilities are enhanced
Culture
Knowledge management: through individuals and in organization (documents, records, etc)
Life Cycle Management
1. Analysising the total environmental impact of the product life cycle (LCA or ecobalance. 2. Organizing the product chain to co-operate in making environmental improvements
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
1. Goal and scope defenition
Determining the goal: product design, finding env. bottle necks
Determining the functional unit of assessment (miles of transport, one-year use of diapers)
2. Inventory analysis
Making a process flow chart
Collecting environmental data
Fixating system boundaries
Processing data into the inventory table
3. Impact assessment
Classification of environmental impacts into categories of environmental problems
Characterization: calculating for each category the total of impacts
Normalization: calculating the magnitude of the category indicators relative to a common reference
Weighting and aggregation: calculating the total scores by simple summation of the category scores
4. Interpretation
Interpretation is important to all stages. It is dependent on the goal of the study. The major goals are product comparison and bottleneck identification
Critiques
Uncertainties due to: setting boundaries, attribution of impact, classification factors, variability in time/chains
Normative choice concerning of categories and methods of normnalisation and weighting
High costs
Easily Biasable
Legitamacy
Organizing a LCM
1. Identifying main fields of application
What will be the focus?
Waste prevention
Product design
Eco-design (DfE): directed to reducing the environmental impacts of the whole product life cycle requiring co-operation of different actors
Can lead to government stimulated eco-labeling
2. Identifying actors that are able to direct the chain
When predominant actors are present: interested and powerful (economy-wise) ones will be chain director
When predominant actors are lacking: product associations take the role of chain director
Independent societies directed by a board/governmental organ/environmental organization. Eco-label organizations are rather weak.
Extending existing structures of chain management to environemtal issues
Co-makership: company and supplier co-operatively design the products to be supplied - with env. aspects taken into account
Product stewardship: company takes responsibility for the use of the product after sale. Pesticide manufacturers can provide proper product information and support resposible application
Just-in-time production: minimize storage costs and stock depriciation
Product quality certification: include next to for example food safety certifications for further environmental requirements
Eco-design
Directed to designing more environmentally friendly products
Reduce or minimize the use of non-renwables
Reduce toxic and harmful emissions to the
environment
Manage renewable resources
Tools
LCA:
Material Flow Analysis and Substance flow Analysis
Green indices & eco-point systems:
Ranking systems attempting to summarize various env. impacts into a simple scale
Material selection
Label advisors such as IBM and Chrysler
Eco-label requirements and guidelines that are provided
Traditionally separate industries engage in a collective approach to competitive advantage involving pysical exchange of materials, water, energy and byproducts
Waste exhange
Within a company between organizational parts
Among co-located companies in an industrial zone
Among nearby companies within e.g. 3 km distance
Dematerialization: de-linking economic growth combined with increased environmental impact
Circular Economy
Design out waste: material cycles closed with composting/re-upcycling so waste is mininal
Build resilience through diversity: more connections over multiple scales are more resilient to external shocks
Rely on energy from renewable sources
Think in systems: helps to understand how parts influence on another and to consider the relationship with infrastructure, env. and society
Waste is food: biological reuse of composed materials and up-cycyling to sustain items in the closed loop
Ecological modernization theory
Core features
Science and technology as central institutions of environmental reform (from end-of-pipe
Stress on role of market dynamics and economic agents (rejecting the opposition of economy and ecology)
Shifting from role of the state (from CnC to participatory)
1. Establishing together with science, the effective environmental policy and an framework to implement this.
Giving room to industry, to elaborate and fill in this long-term policy in its own way.
Modernizing the organization of production and consumption by removing the 'design fault', while taking ecological considerations into account.
Role of the public
Increase of awareness
Pressure from groups/the neighborhood about environmental impact on health
by pressure from env. organizations
By pressure from financiers and customers, taking sustainability into account when investing
By internal pressure from employees
Triad-network model: considering the social-economic structure of a company
Policy
Q's: which authorities are responsible for setting env. standards, issuing regulations, granting permits and CnC? How can relations be improved to stimulated environmental management
Industrial
Q's: what are the env. interests of the main customers of a product(ion process), who are the suppliers, where is the co-operation?
Societal
Q's: who are pressure groups, what are their env. demands, are agreements with e.g. NGOs possible?