See the family within the
framework of a 'capitalist
society'
The Nuclear family is concerned
with social control by teaching its
members to submit to the capitalist
class
The Nuclear family reproduces
unequal relationships, and
works to damp down inevitable
social conflict
A 'capitalist society'
which is based on private
property, driven by profit
and riddled with conflict
between social classes
Engels (1820-95)
Believed that he
monogamous nuclear
family developed as a
means to pass on
property
Monogamy - A form
of marriage which a
person can only be
legally married to
one partner at a
time
The family along with
monogamy was an
ideal mechanism as it
provided a proof a
paternity, and so
property could be
passed on to the right
people
Women's role in
this family was
not that different
to that of
prostitutes
She provided the
sex and heirs
He provided
the wife with
economic
security
Althusser (1971)
Argued that in order for
capitalism to survive the working
class must submit to the ruling
class (bourgeoisie)
He suggested that the family is
one of the ideological state
apparatuses which teach the
riling classes ideology
The ruling class must therefore maintain a false
class consciousness, through winning the
hearts and minds of the working class
Ideological State Apparatuses -
Agencies which serve to spread the
ideology, and justify the power of
the dominant social class
Zaretsky (1976)
Emphasizes with the
ideological role of the family
in propping in capitalism
He sees the family as an
escape route from
oppression and
exploitation at work
A private place where (particularly male
workers) can enjoy a personal life and be
valued as individuals as well as gain some
control of their lives
The family helps workers to live
with their daily oppression in
the world of work
Families bolster capitalism
Criticisms
The traditional
Marxist's
prespective
tends to be
old-fashioned
The Idea that mean marry
and have children ignores
other reasons for getting
married and forming family
Many women now work and
have independent incomes,
and are therefore far less likely
to marry for economic security
Marriage is less of a social necessity
The idea of families existing
purely to pass on ruling
class ideologies, ignores
other things going on the
family
In the 2003 report 'Changing Britain, Changing
Lives' it was found that people are now more
likely to marry for love and affection rather
than as a social obligation
There is a growing emphasis on the emotional
aspects of a relationship, and personal fulfilment
for both men and women