ethical naturalism- this is giving good a
natural property, ethical statements are
factual and can be verified
intuitionism
G E Moore- good is a
simple property like yellow.
people can recognise
goodness when they see it.
we can use our moral
intuition to say whether a
moral statement is true or
false
H. A. Pritchard- we recognise goodness. we
can use reason and intuition of figure it out.
some people had developed their moral
thinking more then others and this is why
there are ethical disagreements
W.D Ross- it was obvious where our duties lie. he gave a list of prima
facie duties. Fidelity. Reparation. Gratitude. Justice. Beneficence. Self-
Improvement. non Maleficence. if the duties conflict we always know
which one to pick
Non- cognitivism
Emotivism
A.J Ayer- moral statements cannot be
verified. therefore they can be nothing
more then emotions
James Rachels- where morality is concerned there can
be no right or wrong
Stevenson- moral terms are
descriptive and emotive. when we
hear the word steal it invokes a
feeling within us. it is also trying to
influence someone elses attitudes.
THEY ARE BASED ON EXPERIENCES
perscriptivism
Hare- attempted to show that ethical language is
prescriptive and the role of ethical statements is to say
what ought to be done. They are moral because they
are universal. It is not based on truth but it aims to get
everyone to do the same in similar situations