Includes the death of a
significant other and loss of
valued possessions (lands of
indigenous people)
Symbolic
May include the loss of a previous
role or status, or lost
opportunityies
Eg. Divorce, retirement
Ambiguous
May be physical and symbolic
Absence of public validation or recognition of loss
Public visibility-invisibility; acceptability-unacceptability
Loss Associated with Own Chronic Illness
Loss of control over body
Loss of control over disease
Loss of identity
Loss of independence
Loss of social support
Loss of certainty - over own life and health
Bereavement
refers to the objective situation of an individual who has
recently experienced the loss of someone or something
significant and of personal value.
Grief
is the emotional (affective) response to that loss,
e.g., sadness, anger, helplessness, guilt
Mourning
refers to the acts of expression of
grief. Culturally defined.
Components of Grief
Somatic experiences
physical experiences
Somatic Expressions of Normal Grief
Bodily weaknesses, which includes many
elements of depression, Hollowness in
stomach, Oversensitivity to noise, Lack of
energy, Sleeplessness, Dry mouth, Muscle
weakness,Tightness in chest and throat,
Breathlessness, Depersonalisation
Cognitive experiences
thoughts, beliefs
Cognitive Expressions of Normal Grief
Preoccupation with the image of the
deceased person or how things were prior to
the loss, Hallucinations, Helplessness,
Disbelief, Confusion, Impaired concentration
Daily activities show change, Sleep and appetite
disturbances, Crying, Social withdrawal, avoidance,
Difficulty in initiating or maintaining behaviours, Restless
overactivity, Sighing, Absent-minded behaviour
Models of the Normal Course of Grief
Process/Phase Model
Passive movement through a
number of inevitable stages
A disrupted concept
Task Models
More active process
The bereaved person
negotiates a series of tasks
in relation to their loss
Phase Model of Normal Grief (Stroebe & Stroebe)
First phase: Numbness, shock, disbelief
Sense of unreality, Most pronounced
when totally unexpected, Possibly
gives time to mobilize resources, May
appear unaffected because of the
failure to quite grasp the change, But
reality of absence leads to lessening of
denial
Second Phase: Yearning and Protest
Somatic and Cognitive experiences
Awareness of reality, Extreme
psychological distress and
physiological arousal, Searching for
the deceased (vigilance), Physical
symptoms, elements of depression,
choking, breathlessness, crying,
loss of appetite, stomach ache,
chest pains. Preoccupation with the
image of the dead person,
daydreams of interactions with
dead person, hearing or seeing
them (hallucinations).
Affective experiences
Yearning. Guilt, self-reproach and trying to
understand their contribution to the death,
self- accusations of negligence and
exaggerations of small omissions, low
self-esteem, helplessness. Anger and hostility
towards others.
Behavioural experiences
daily activities change, restlessness, lack of capacity to
initiate and maintain organised patterns of behaviour.
Activities lose significance in absence of other person.
Third Phase: Despair
Despair – searching abandoned,
despair that anything will be
meaningful again, apathy, depression
and withdrawal. Permanence of loss is
recognised – thus may be even more
devastating than earlier time. Inability
to concentrate or start new things.
Final Phase: Recovery and Restitution
Growing acceptance of changed situation, more
frequent positive feeling, requires effort,
recurrence of old symptoms. New identity,
re-establish old friendships, make new ones.
Frequently requires effort to regain purpose, adopt
new roles, manage loneliness. More realistic (not
idealised) memories of the dead person.
Worden’s (1982) Four Core Tasks of Resolving Grief
!. To accept reality of loss
2. To experience the pain of grief
3. To adjust to an environment in which the deceased in absent
4. To withdraw emotional energy from the deceased and reinvest in other relationships
Dual Process Model of Grief (Stroebe & Schut, 1999)
Oscillation between two contrasting modes of functioning.
“Loss orientation” – the griever engages in emotion- focussed
coping, exploring and expressing the range of emotional
responses associated with the loss.
“Restoration orientation” – griever engages in problem-
focused coping and is required to focus on the many
external adjustments required by the loss, including
diversion from and attention to ongoing life demands.
Time Course of Grief
People may get used to being without their loved one, but
it is most usual that they continue to have an emotional
involvement with the loved one – don’t really break bonds
In this sense, grief never ends, but rather changes.
Carnelley et al (2006) found that people continue to experience memories and have
conversations about their deceased spouse beyond 4 years after the loss. As long as 20
years after the loss, the typical respondent still thought of their spouse once every week
or two and had a conversation about him or her on average once a month.
Trajectories Through Grief
Bonanno et al (2002) identified five
distinctive trajectories or patterns of
grief: Common grief or recovery (11%),
Stable low distress or resilience (46%),
Depression followed by improvement
(10%), Chronic grief (16%), Chronic
depression (8%)
Determinants of Outcome of Grief
Bonanno et al (2004) found that the
highest levels of distress were
exhibited when:
There were high levels of personal dependency prior to the death
A lack of expectation or psychological preparation for the loss
Worden (2008) identified seven factors determining outcome:
The extent of the loss physically, psychologically and spiritually, The
nature of the attachment, Mode of death (or loss) , Historical
antecedents, Demographic and personality variables, Social variables –
social support, sociocultural and cultural variables, Concurrentstressors
Pathological (Complicated) Grief
An unsatisfactory concept. The range of normal grief is so wide.
But when it continues to interfere with life for a prolonged period, or a
person falls into an unabated depression, commits suicide, or suffers
health consequences, the notion of pathological grief may be useful.
Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder (DSM5)
Described as a combination of separation distress and
cognitive, emotional and behavioural symptoms that
can develop after the death of a significant other;
The symptoms must last for at least 12 months in adults
And cause significant impairment in social,
occupational and other important areas of functioning;
Symptoms may include: sleep disruption,
substance abuse, depression, compromised
immune function, hypertension, cardiac problems,
suicide, and work and social impairments.
Maladjusted Outcomes
Physical
General ill health and symptomatology
Psychosomatic disorders – immune function
impairment and corticosteroid effects
Death
Psychosocial
Psychiatric and other psychosocial disorders, e.g., •
Anxiety states • Shoplifting • Depression (suicidal
thoughts and actions)
Altered relationship patterns – e.g., over-protectiveness of children
Vulnerability to loss – cope less well with future loss
Anniversary phenomenon – re-awakened grief (I think normal rather than pathological)
Psychoanalytic Theories of Grief
Freud proposed that: Love is conceptualised as
the attachment of libidinal energy to the mental
representation of the loved person. The
psychological function of grief is to free the
individual from these ties to the deceased.
Grief work – rechanneling of intense feelings of attachment,
process of reliving and working through past events which involved
the deceased and the survivor so that the survivor can work out
how they could do similar things with some-one else.
Attachment Theory and Grief
Role of attachment in children
What happens when attachment figure not present in children
(protest – despair – detachment)
Attachment in adult life
When adult attachment figure not present a
similar detachment process is engaged in
Behavioural Approach
Grief and loss of reinforcement
Loss of company - loneliness
(Doesn’t account for different feelings when some- one is away but not dead)
Stress and Crisis Models
Initial crisis throws the individual into a state
of helplessness where coping strategies are no
longer effective in mastering the problem.
Defences are weakened. But the crisis can not continue
and the individual must adapt over time and develop new
coping strategies.
Role of Counselling
Normalise the diverse emotions of grief (anger, helplessness, sadness)
Normalise the unusual experiences of grief (e.g., hallucinations)
Support the experience and expression of feelings, clarify
ambivalent feelings – removing guilt
Provide time to grieve
Assist living in the presence of the loss
Assist in finding new ways to gain pleasure
in life and new roles (behavioural
interventions, problem solving)
Assist in looking at positive rather than
negative aspects of situation (cognitive
restructuring, CBT)
Exposure therapy – overcoming avoidance of
reminders that limit moving forward.
Provide continuing support
Identify grief responses that are
not normal and treat or refer
Effectiveness of Grief Counselling
Recent debate in the literature has questioned the
effectiveness of grief counselling. But the most comprehensive
and appropriate analysis shows that grief counselling is
helpful, especially for self-referred clients and for the recently
bereaved (Allumbaugh & Hoyt, 1999; Larson & Hoyt, 2007)
Supporting a Grieving Person
There is no right or wrong way to grieve – avoid
telling the bereaved what they should be feeling
Grief may involve extreme emotions – don’t
judge or take grief reactions personally. There is
no set timetable for grieving - don’t pressure
bereaved to move on
Listen with compassion – accept an
acknowledge feelings, offer comfort without
minimizing the loss. Offer practical assistance
– take the initiative as the grieving person
may not wish to impose. Provide ongoing
support – be there for the long haul. Watch
for warning signs – difficulty functioning in
daily life, extreme focus on death, take talk of
suicide seriously