null
US
Sign In
Sign Up for Free
Sign Up
We have detected that Javascript is not enabled in your browser. The dynamic nature of our site means that Javascript must be enabled to function properly. Please read our
terms and conditions
for more information.
Next up
Copy and Edit
You need to log in to complete this action!
Register for Free
4951522
obedience: social - psychological factors
Description
AS - Level psychology (chapter 1 - social influence ) Mind Map on obedience: social - psychological factors, created by Daisy U on 26/03/2016.
No tags specified
psychology
chapter 1 - social influence
as - level
Mind Map by
Daisy U
, updated more than 1 year ago
More
Less
Created by
Daisy U
almost 9 years ago
23
3
0
Resource summary
obedience: social - psychological factors
agentic state
Eichmann triad for war crimes and said he was just obeying orders
Milgram - a person does not take responsibility for their actions
autonomous state
opposite of agentic state
free to behave how they want and have responsibility over their actions
agentic shift
the move from autonomous state to agentic
when a person sees someone as a figure of authority
greater power due to social hierarchy
binding factors
many of Milgram's participants wanted to quit but couldn't
binding factors - allow the person to ignore or minimise damage they are making
e.g. shifting responsibility to the victim - they shouldn't have applied
or denying that they were causing any damage
legitimacy of authority
societies have a hierarchy
teachers police nightclub bouncers all have authority in some situations
the authority is legitimate as it is agreed by society
consequences
some people have the power to punish others
we will follow them as they have authority
we learn it from parents and teachers
destructive authority
problems can occur when legitimate authority becomes destructive
e.g. Hitler
use their authority to order cruel things
Milgram supports this by using prods in his experiment - people went against their conscience
evaluation - agentic shift
research support
Blass & Schmitt
students shown Milgram's study and asked to identify who was responsible
students said experimenter
the experimenter was top of the hierarchy and had expert authority (scientist)
limited explanation
doesn't say why some people didn't obey
in Hofling's nurse study not all obeyed or showed signs of distress when they should
evaluation - legitimacy of authority
cultural differences
strength - countries differ to how obedient they are
Kilham & Mann
replicated study in Australia - 16% went all the way
Mantell
replicated in Germany - 85% went all the way
it shows how different societies are structured & how children see authority figures
good validity
evaluation +
obedience alibi
limitation of agentic state
Nazis behaviour cannot be explained by authority and agentic shift
e.g. Mandell found
a group of German police shot civilians even thought they were not directly told to do so
real life crimes of obedience
strength of legitimacy of authority
help to explain war crimes
Kelman & Hamilton
the My Lai massacre can be understood in terms of the power of hierarchy of the US army - only following orders
Show full summary
Hide full summary
Want to create your own
Mind Maps
for
free
with GoConqr?
Learn more
.
Similar
History of Psychology
mia.rigby
Biological Psychology - Stress
Gurdev Manchanda
Bowlby's Theory of Attachment
Jessica Phillips
Psychology subject map
Jake Pickup
Psychology A1
Ellie Hughes
Memory Key words
Sammy :P
Psychology | Unit 4 | Addiction - Explanations
showmestarlight
The Biological Approach to Psychology
Gabby Wood
Chapter 5: Short-term and Working Memory
krupa8711
Cognitive Psychology - Capacity and encoding
T W
Nervous Systems and the Brain - Lecture 1
Georgina Burchell
Browse Library