Attitudes of main powers to situation in Europe in 1945

Description

Attitudes of USA, USSR & GB (in a cold war context)
hannahr
Mind Map by hannahr, updated more than 1 year ago
hannahr
Created by hannahr over 10 years ago
188
0

Resource summary

Attitudes of main powers to situation in Europe in 1945
  1. SOVIET ATTITUDES
    1. Stalin's main aim: safeguard & rebuild USSR after devastation of WWII
      1. 20 million dead
      2. traditional-believed what USSR got after 1945 should be determined by degree of what it had suffered
        1. Expected economic assistance from USA
        2. foreign policy based on taking advantage of military situation in Europe & prevent invasion from West
          1. occupied as much of E. Europe as possible (buffer zone)
          2. Stalin's aims would result in domination over large parts of Europe
            1. unacceptable to USA (dvlpd. own foreign policy to account for this in 1945)
          3. US ATTITUDES
            1. 1945: Truman replaced Roosevelt: moved from accomodation to confrontation
              1. policy of contaiment
                1. 'Iron Fist' approach as a reaction against policy of appeasement
                2. wanted to revive economy
                  1. spread of communism and subsequent closure of free markets needed to be avoided
                  2. Failed to understand Soviet demands for security
                    1. saw it as attempt to spread communism
                    2. Much of US public favoured isolationism
                      1. US foreign policy in the balance in 1945
                    3. BRITISH ATTITUDES
                      1. 1946: Attlee replaced Churchill
                        1. foreign policies of GB & USA more in step with need to stand firm against USSR
                        2. war produced tripling of national debt & bankrupt economy
                          1. impossible to limit Soviet influence in Europe without USA
                          2. US=isolationist
                            1. little West could do to prevent Stalin acting as he wished
                              1. hope that personal agreement with Stalin might limit his actions
                          Show full summary Hide full summary

                          Similar

                          Weimar Revision
                          Tom Mitchell
                          Hitler and the Nazi Party (1919-23)
                          Adam Collinge
                          History of Medicine: Ancient Ideas
                          James McConnell
                          GCSE History – Social Impact of the Nazi State in 1945
                          Ben C
                          Conferences of the Cold War
                          Alina A
                          Bay of Pigs Invasion : April 1961
                          Alina A
                          The Berlin Crisis
                          Alina A
                          Using GoConqr to study History
                          Sarah Egan
                          Germany 1918-39
                          Cam Burke
                          History- Medicine through time key figures
                          gemma.bell
                          The Weimar Republic, 1919-1929
                          shann.w