EAZ: raise
motivation/achievement in low
income, deprived areas - Ofsted
praised things like breakfast and
HW club
EiC: replaced EAZs, had
similar aim. Special
programs like gifted, city
learning centres, mentors,
cheap comp lease. More
effective than EAZs
SURE START: under 4 and families in
deprived areas. Improving health,
education and employment. Based on
early intervention.
(-) Difficult to evaluate - every
program is different and only ST
results available. Disappointing results
after 3 years.
EMA: attempted to reduce class gap in
education - weekly cash allowance
payable to low income 16-19 year olds.
(-) Class gap widened in
HE. MC: 79% WC: 16%
(2001) (MC:55% WC: 6% -
1991)
(-) contradictory as they introduced tuition fees
which reduced WC in HE. (Whitty)
Policies like 'Girls into Science
and Technology to reduce
gender inequality
assimilation: ethnic groups
to assimilate into British
culture. (-) real problem is
poverty and racism.
MCE: valuing all
cultures in school -
raise minority pupils
self-esteem
misguided; black pupils
not failing due to low
self-esteem
tokenism; fails to tackle
institutional racism
PROMOTING DIVERSITY
Specialist schools; rejected osfa view.
Spec in particular subject area. - increase
comp and raise standards
(-) not clear why standards have risen - Ofsted
reports found schools often do better outside spec
subject
higher intake of MC
students. Low income
schools difficulty
raising funds
schools can be selective (high
in demand) choose more able
students. (MC)
Academies: plans to turn 200 failing
comprehensive schools into A's to improve
standards. Mixed results - some improved,
some didn't.
ASSESSMENT + TARGETS
Pupils, teachers and schools
assessed with key stage tests (GCSE,
AL, Ofsted)
assessments published
and schools ranked in
league tables
key targets set to raise standards,
encourage competition and measure
performance
SCHOOL LEAGUE TABLES
Only based on exam results until recently
value added - difference
school made from 11-16
most improved -
GCSE results over
time
(-) fail to provide accurate measure of school
performance. GCSE may say more about
social bg + VA doesn't take class into
account.
2006- social factors included - what
pupils expected to achieve. Schools
whose pupils exceed this do well in LT
Grace: low income schools do better here
than exam results/ VA measure
exam results remain basis for
parents decision - encourages
recruitment of MC over special
needs/excluded as well as
teacing to the test, not
understanding and learning.
VOCATIONAL EDUC + TRAINING
Main role of educ to
provide
skills+knowledge
required for work force
Tomlinson: education
system must respond to
competitive global
economy by improving
skills/quals
Labour seen all education as vocational.
CRITICISMS
Tomlinson: they narrowed education to an economic function
- obsessed with raising standards so UK can compete in
global market
preoccupation with comp,
choice + standards puts
schools under pressure to
stay at the top soselect
more able pupils.
knowledge+understanding not
priority - exam tech and rote
learning/revision more imp
McKnight, Glennerster and Lupton;
standards appear to have risen but
gap between classes remains as
wide as 1989
Trowler; as long as
social inequality
exists in wider
society it'll be
reflected in educ
private/fee paying schools still exist despite labour opposing them
NEW DEAL
aim; reduce youth
unemployment (18-24)
personal adviser to guide them through;
training/full time educ, work for 6 months,
subsidized job = loss of benefits if they
didn't participate
(-) 40% failed to find lasting
jobs
(-) critics; reduction due to
economic improvement
Labour = great success
VOCATIONAL QUALS
Aimed to raise skill
level; 2/3 employers see
little value in these.
GNVOQs; alts to
GCSE+AL.
rebranded as
vocational ALs
so could be seen
as equivilent
(-) cosmetic
exercise =
route to low
paid/status
jobs