null
US
Sign In
Sign Up for Free
Sign Up
We have detected that Javascript is not enabled in your browser. The dynamic nature of our site means that Javascript must be enabled to function properly. Please read our
terms and conditions
for more information.
Next up
Copy and Edit
You need to log in to complete this action!
Register for Free
7271919
Social Influence (Yr 12)
Description
Basic prompts
No tags specified
psychology
social influence
aqa
psychology
social influence
a level
Mind Map by
Sofia Henderson
, updated more than 1 year ago
More
Less
Created by
Sofia Henderson
almost 8 years ago
33
2
0
Resource summary
Social Influence (Yr 12)
Obedience
Milgram
Procedure
Findings
Evaluation
Low internal validity: Orne and Holland, Gina Perry
High internal validity: Sheridan and King
Supporting replication: La Jeu de la Mort
Good external validity: Hofling et al
Situational variables
Proximity
Location
Uniform
Evaluation
Alibi for evil: Mendel
Cultural bias: Smith and Bond
Cross-cultural replication: Miranda et al
High internal validity
Social Psychological Factors
The Agentic State
Positive self-image
Legitmacy of authority
Requires institution
Binding factors
Evaluation
Support: Blass and Schmitt
Agentic shift is limited explanation
Cannot be applied to Nazis: Mandel
Application to war crime: Kelman and Hamilton
Dispositional Explanations
Adorno's F scale
Altermeyeer: RWA
Elms and Milgram
Evaluation
Correlation, not causation
Political bias: Christie and Jahoda
Limited explanation - Nazis
Methodological problems: Greenstien
Conformity
Types (Kelman)
Compliance
Identification
Internalisation
Explanations
Normative Social Influence
Informational Social Influence
Evaluation - research support
NSI smoking: Linkenbach and Perkins
NSI towels: Schultz et al
ISI maths: Lucas et al
ISI political opinion: Fein et al
Asch
Procedure
Findings
Group size
Unanimity
Task difficulty
Evaluation - criticisms
Culture and time: Perrin and Spencer
Ethics - deception
Limited application: Neto, Bond and Smith
Artificiality: Fiske
Zimbardo
Procedure
Findings
Conclusions
Evaluation
Lack of realism: Bahuazazi and Mohavedi
Had realism
Lack of research support: Rischer and Haslam
High control
Influence
Resistance to Social Influence
Social support
Conformity - Asch
Obedience - Milgram
Locus of control: Rotter
High internals resist
Evaluation
Conformity: Allen and Levine
LOC: Holland
Contradicting research: Twenge et al
Minority Influence
Consistency - Nemeth
Commitment
Flexiility - Nemeth
Moscovici
Procedure
Findings
Evaluation
Consistency meta-analysis: Wood et al
Depth of thought support: Martin et al
Artificiality
Limited applications
Social Change
Moscovici's conversion stages
Drawing attention to issue
Cognitive conflict
Consistency
Augmentation principle
Snowball effect
Evaluation
NSI support: Nolan et al
Minority influence is only indirectly effective: Nemeth
Role of deeper processing
Barriers to social change
Show full summary
Hide full summary
Want to create your own
Mind Maps
for
free
with GoConqr?
Learn more
.
Similar
The Breakdown Model (Rollie & Duck 2006)
helen.rebecca
Cognitive Psychology - Capacity and encoding
T W
Social Psychology As level
Gurdev Manchanda
Success and failure of dieting
helen.rebecca
Byrne and Clore's Reward/ Need Satisfaction Theory, 1970
Ashleigh Huddart
Psychology | Unit 4 | Addiction - Explanations
showmestarlight
Psychology subject map
Jake Pickup
Biological Psychology - Stress
Gurdev Manchanda
PSYA1 - attachment, AQA psychology
T W
Psychology A1
Ellie Hughes
Memory Key words
Sammy :P
Browse Library