Plato noticed that the physical world is always
changing and that nothing ever stays the same
How could people attain true and certain knowledge, if
the objects they wanted to know about were never
the same from one moment to the next?
World of Forms
World of senses:
This world changes and is an empirical
(measurable) shadow world of a better
other world
World of ideas/concepts:
Can have knowledge
through logic.
Hierarchy of the Forms
Good is the highest Form. Then follows beauty,
truth and justice.
In our world we just have shadows of these higher Forms
The Particulars participate in the Forms.
Only ONE Form of everything and thats the Form of the good. The Form
of the good is the ultimate Form
A priori knowledge. When we understand something as
"good" we are recollecting "goodness"
Allegory of the cave
Plato was a pupil of Socrates and questioned what we knew to be
truely real and challenge people's basic assumptios to make them
realise how little they knew. As a result he developed his Theory of
Knowledge.
Theory of Knowledge
True knowledge can only be gained by our minds because
our senses decieve us
A group of prisoners are chained together facing the
back wall of a cave
They can see shadows (there is a fire in the cave) being cast
on the wall and they percieve these to be the extent of their
reality
One day one of the prisoners escape from the cave
It takes him a long time to climb out of the cave. Once he gets out,
it takes a long time for his eyes to adjust to the sun
Once his eyes are adjusted, he realises that the outside
world is better than inside the cave and returns to tell the
others
But the others dont believe him so
they all stay in the cave
Prisoners = humans, Fire = our sun, Cave = our world, Escapee = philosopher,
Ascent = journey to the Forms is hard, Shadows = this material world, Breaking
free = discovering the world of the Forms, Hard to see the light = just how
amazing the Forms are, Sun = Form of good, Seeing everything sharp = our souls
going back to the Forms
When he gives us the Cave anology, Plato wants us to understand:
The relation between the physical, material world
and the higher world of the Forms
The ways in which material, physical can blind people to
what is really important
The ignorance of humanity when people do not engage
in philosophy
The potential for true knowledge that
philosophy brings
The injustice of the death of Socrates
That there is another world that we cannot see from the position that we are
in, yet which we can reach and which will give us enlightment
The intial difficulties of grappling with
philosophy
The hostility that people often feel when faced with philosophical ideas that challenge
previosuly-help beliefs
Strengths and Weaknesses:
Strengths
It explains why everything comes to an end but the
universe still exists
Suggestions that objective does exist
Soul? basis for beliefs
Weaknesses
No empirical evidence
Is goodness objective?
Silly format, is there a Form of a cat or cancer?
How can another world link to this world?
Aristotle (384-322 BCE)
Aristotle was a pupil of Plato
Aristotle didn't accept Plato's view that there
is another world, more real than this one,
which can be the objective of true knowledge
Aristotle rejected the idea that there was a "World of Forms", seperate
from this world
For Aristotle, observation of the
natural world was crucial
Aristotles 4 causes:
1. Material
This explains what something is made from
2. Formal
This is how Aristotle termed the form,
or shape that something has. Allows it
to be identified
3. Efficient
This is name Aristotle gave to the activity
that makes something happen
4. Final
The most important cause, the final
cause of soemthing is its purpose, its
reason for existing at all
Strengths and Weaknesses:
Strengths
Rely on reflections of the natural world
Applies to things that already exist
No evidence that it isn't true
Weaknesses
Rely on experience
Pime Mover
State of motion
Cause and
effect
All things are in a permanent state
of motion
Objects in the physical world are
always in a state of actuality and
potentiality
Planets seem to be moving eternally
Change in motion is always caused
God and the 5 implications
1. He believed the God (understood as the PM) does not depend on anything else for existence. God has
no potential, which means he has no capacity for change, then he must exist independently or
"necessairly"
2. He must also be eternal, because of his lack of potential
3. God must be perfectly good, because badness is related to some kind of lacking, an
absence of something that ought to be there - and if God is pure actualit, the he must
contain everything that oght to be there, so he must be perfect
4. God must be immaterial, and beyond time and space. If God is immaterial, the God can't
perform any physical activity.
5. The PM is the final cause of everything that exists in the universe. The PM is transcendent,
while at the same time, being the ultimate telos for everything
Purpose
Non-physical thing = prime mover moves thing by
thought so can't think of anything else because it it
involves good but the PM is 100% good
All things point to the PM and the PM is drawn to
the universe like a cat is drawn to milk.