Rational nature alone has absolute and
conditional value.
Kant
Believes humans are distinguished
from other life by our capacity to
reason.
Categorical imperative can be
applied to the environment in
different ways.
'Act only on that maxim whereby you can
at the same time will that it should
become universal law.'
We can make environmental laws if we agree that
everyone should follow it.
Clearly pollution or exploiting the environment would
be illogical and immoral becasuse not everyone could
do it.
Nature mustn't be treated as a
means to an end but an end in
itself.
Rejects the idea that domestic animals are simply
for our benefit and says there are moral limits
and rules on how we should use them.
Killing animals for food is
justifiable but killing them for
sport is not.
He argued that animals exist to be used but with
that privilege comes a duty of care.
Believed treating animals or the natural
world badly would make us into cruel and
callous people.
We would then in turn
treat each other badly.
Cruelty towards animals would not be
wrong in its own right but due to
consequences on humans, it should be
considered intrinsically wrong.
A person cannot have good will unless he
shows concern for the welfare of non-rational
beings and the natural world for its own sake.
We have a duty to ourselves to
survive and thus exploiting and
destroying the environment is
immoral - it would damage the
chances of humanity surviving.
Links aesthetic beauty of the
environment to moral goodness.
To destroy beauty is illogical and immoral since it is
something that rational people when meeting to
decide moral laws, would consider a vital part of
human existence.
Ronald Hepburn
Kant's statement 'act so as to treat humanity never only
as a means but always also as an end' links to the
proper human response to the natural environment.
We should view the environment with 'wonder'
Kant, according to Hepburn held an awe for the
natural world.
We should not exploit the natural
environment for the needs of
humans.
Paul Taylor
Takes the view that respect for nature
is a universal law for all rational
beings.
However, he wouldn't afford plants and animals
moral rights but believed they should have legal
rights so they're protected.
The concept of 'inherent worth'
means nature does have value in
and of itself.
Criticisms
It is logically possible to universalise lack of care for the environment.
An anthropocentric approach, all
things seem to exist for humanity.
Creates a certain
arrogance on humans
part
Kant's theory seems
more theoretical than
practical.